Skip to main content

Table 3 Pooled analysis results of systematic review for each group, based on 910 patients studies

From: Magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a pooled analysis of the diagnostic accuracy

Stage

Sensitivity (95%CI)

Specitivity (95%CI)

Positive LR (95%CI)

Negative LR (95%CI)

DOR (95%CI)

AUROC (95%CI)

Q test, I2

P value

Sen

Spe

F ≥ 1

0.77(0.69–0.83)

0.90(0.83–0.94)

7.5(4.4–12.7)

0.26(0.20–0.35)

29(15–53)

0.89(0.86–0.92)

77.35%

77.78%

0.99

F ≥ 2

0.87(0.74–0.94)

0.86(0.71–0.94)

6.2(3.0–12.6)

0.15(0.08–0.29)

41(21–81)

0.93(0.90–0.95)

84.83%

90.66%

0.53

F ≥ 3

0.89(0.81–0.94)

0.84(0.63–0.94)

5.6(2.2–14.2)

0.13(0.09–0.21)

42(17–100)

0.93(0.90–0.95)

77.40%

94.85%

0.72

F ≥ 4

0.94(0.85–0.98)

0.75(0.35–0.94)

3.8(1.1–13.1)

0.08(0.04–0.16)

50(16–152)

0.95(0.93–0.97)

92.49%

96.60%

0.45

  1. LR Likelihood ratio, DOR Diagnostic odds ratio, AUROC Area under the receiver operating characteristic