Skip to main content

Table 3 Favourable and unfavourable viral outcomes by drug category

From: Adherence in chronic hepatitis B: associations between medication possession ratio and adverse viral outcomes

 

Favourable outcomesa

n. of events (% of total outcomes by drug)

Unfavourable outcomes

n. of events (% of total outcomes by drug)

Drugs

Individuals

n (% of total)

Individuals with 2 events

Fully suppressed (undetectable for study period)

Fully suppressed (became undetectable)

Transient rise

Adequate viral suppression

Total favourable outcomes

Viral breakthrough 1 log10 rise

Non-transient rise

Not suppressed

Total unfavourable outcomes

All

642

40

340(48.85)

179(26.25)

55(8.06)

47(6.89)

621(91.06)

17(2.49)

42(6.54)

2(< 0.01%)

61(8.94)

First line therapy

 Entecavir 0.5 mg

407(63.40)

22

216(50.35)

118(27.21)

35(8.16)

27(3.96)

396(92.31)

8(1.86)

24(5.90)

1(<.01%)

33(7.69)

 Tenofovir

143(22.27)

11

61(39.61)

48(31.17)

10(6.49)

19(2.79)

138(89.61)

6(3.90)

9 (6.29)

1(< 0.01%)

16(10.39)

Other

 Entecavir 1 mg

29(4.52)

1

16(53.33)

2(10.00)

6(20.00)

1(3.33)

26(86.67)

2(6.67)

2(6.90)

0(0.00)

4(13.33)

Older drugs

 Lamivudine

53(8.26)

4

40(70.18)

8(14.04)

4(7.02)

0(0.00)

52(91.23)

1(1.75)

4(7.54)

0(0.00)

5(8.77)

 Adefovir

10(1.56)

1

7(58.33)

2(20.00)

0(0.00)

0(0.00)

9(75.00)

0(0.00)

3(25.00)

0(0.00)

3(25.00)

  1. aSee Table 1 for definition of favourable and unfavourable outcomes