Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of AIMS65, GBS, Pre-endoscopic Rockall scores (PRS), and Rockall scores (RS) with significant clinical endpoints

From: AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

 AUC (95% CI)P-value of pairwise the AUC curves
AIMS65PRSRSGBS
Mortality (n = 17)
 AIMS650.84 (0.81–0.88)*0.130.010.07
 PRS0.74 (0.70–0.78)0.13*0.860.74
 RS0.75 (0.71–0.79)0.090.86*0.65
 GBS0.72 (0.68–0.76)0.070.740.66*
Serious clinical outcomes (n = 134)
 AIMS650.68 (0.64–0.72)*0.540.520.40
 PRS0.66 (0.62–0.70)0.53*0.050.76
 RS0.70 (0.65–0.74)0.520.05*0.16
 GBS0.65 (0.61–0.70)0.400.760.16*
Rebleeding (n = 65)
 AIMS650.58 (0.54–0.62)*0.970.110.43
 PRS0.58 (0.54–0.62)0.97*0.010.49
 RS0.63 (0.59–0.68)0.110.01*0.04
 GBS0.55 (0.51–0.59)0.430.490.04*
ICU admission (n = 86)
 AIMS650.73 (0.69–0.77)*0.440.390.67
 PRS0.70 (0.66–0.74)0.43*0.900.78
 RS0.70 (0.66–0.74)0.390.90*0.72
 GBS0.71 (0.67–0.75)0.670.780.72*
Transfusion requirement (n = 397)
 AIMS650.69 (0.65–0.73)*0.950.06< 0.001
 PRS0.70 (0.65–0.73)0.95*0.01< 0.001
 RS0.74 (0.70–0.77)0.060.01*< 0.001
 GBS0.87 (0.84–0.90)< 0.001< 0.001< 0.001*
  1. PRS Preendoscopic Rockall score, RS Rockall score
  2. *Not available