AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Table 3 Comparison of AIMS65, GBS, Pre-endoscopic Rockall scores (PRS), and Rockall scores (RS) with significant clinical endpoints

	AUC (95% CI)	P-value of pairwise the AUC curves
	AUC (95% CI)	AIMS65	PRS	RS	GBS
Mortality (n = 17)
AIMS65	0.84 (0.81–0.88)	*	0.13	0.01	0.07
PRS	0.74 (0.70–0.78)	0.13	*	0.86	0.74
RS	0.75 (0.71–0.79)	0.09	0.86	*	0.65
GBS	0.72 (0.68–0.76)	0.07	0.74	0.66	*
Serious clinical outcomes (n = 134)
AIMS65	0.68 (0.64–0.72)	*	0.54	0.52	0.40
PRS	0.66 (0.62–0.70)	0.53	*	0.05	0.76
RS	0.70 (0.65–0.74)	0.52	0.05	*	0.16
GBS	0.65 (0.61–0.70)	0.40	0.76	0.16	*
Rebleeding (n = 65)
AIMS65	0.58 (0.54–0.62)	*	0.97	0.11	0.43
PRS	0.58 (0.54–0.62)	0.97	*	0.01	0.49
RS	0.63 (0.59–0.68)	0.11	0.01	*	0.04
GBS	0.55 (0.51–0.59)	0.43	0.49	0.04	*
ICU admission (n = 86)
AIMS65	0.73 (0.69–0.77)	*	0.44	0.39	0.67
PRS	0.70 (0.66–0.74)	0.43	*	0.90	0.78
RS	0.70 (0.66–0.74)	0.39	0.90	*	0.72
GBS	0.71 (0.67–0.75)	0.67	0.78	0.72	*
Transfusion requirement (n = 397)
AIMS65	0.69 (0.65–0.73)	*	0.95	0.06	< 0.001
PRS	0.70 (0.65–0.73)	0.95	*	0.01	< 0.001
RS	0.74 (0.70–0.77)	0.06	0.01	*	< 0.001
GBS	0.87 (0.84–0.90)	< 0.001	< 0.001	< 0.001	*

ISSN: 1471-230X