Skip to main content

Table 5 Budget impact analysis of introducing FIB-4, ELF and fibroscan into primary care risk stratification pathways compared to standard care after 1 year for a population of 60 million patients

From: Cost-comparison analysis of FIB-4, ELF and fibroscan in community pathways for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

 

Scenario 2 - FIB-4/ELF

Scenario 3 - FIB-4/ TE

Scenario 4 - SC + ELF

Scenario 5 - SC + TE

Pathway performance:

 Incremental number of referrals (stratified as ≥F3 fibrosis) (% increase vs SOC)

− 587,700 (−70%)

− 533,217 (−67%)

− 474,000 (−56%)

− 242,340 (−25%)

 Incremental number of ≥F3 disease referred

71,640 (53%)

74,041 (45%)

81,000 (39%)

86,220 (25%)

 Incremental number of ≤F2 disease referred

− 659,340 (−85%)

− 607,258 (−78%)

− 555,021 (−71%)

− 328,560 (−42%)

 Incremental number of cirrhotics referred

2786 (113%)

2880 (116%)

3153 (128%)

3359 (136%)

 Incremental number of patients incorrectly identified as ≤F2

−71,640 (−61%)

−74,041 (− 63%)

−81,000 (− 69%)

−86,220 (− 74%)

IMPACT ON END STAGE LIVER DISEASE

 BCLC Stage 0/A curable HCC

(% of all HCC)

121 (36%)

125 (38%)

137 (41%)

146 (44%)

 BCLC Stage B-D incurable HCC (% of all HCC)

−121 (− 29%)

− 125 (− 30%)

−137 (− 33%)

− 146 (− 35%)

 Varices detected via surveillance programme (% of all new varices)

50 (113%)

51 (117%)

57 (128%)

60 (136%)

 Emergency presentation of varices

(% of all new varices)

−50 (− 30%)

−51 (− 31%)

−57 (− 34%)

−60 (− 36%)

 Mild/Moderate ‘other’ complications

5 (6%)

5 (6%)

6 (7%)

< 6 (7%)

 Severe ‘other’ complication requiring hospital admission

−5 (− 9%)

− 5 (− 9%)

− 6 (− 10%)

−6 (− 10%)

Outcomes

 Mortality / 1000 NAFLD patients

−67 (− 0.34%)

−69 (− 0.35%)

−76 (− 0.39%)

−81 (− 0.41%)

Budget

 Cost of tests

£24.9 M

£25.5

£100.8

£103.2 M

 Total expenditure

-£406 M (−23%)

-£364 M (−21%)

-£243 M (−14%)

-£65 M (− 4%)

  1. Tabulated analysis of the impact of non-invasive liver fibrosis tests for the management of patients with NAFLD (scenarios 2–5) compared to the standard of care (scenario 1) in the primary care setting for a population of 60 million patients with 20% NAFLD prevelance risk stratified on a 5 year cycle