Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants

From: The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate

Patients,n

4940

Age,years,mean ± SD

61.4 ± 10.3

Male(%)

2380 (48.2)

Indication(%)

 Screening, Surveillance, Diagnostic

4186 (84.7)

 For polypectomy

314 (6.4)

 For ESD

440 (8.9)

Time of day colonoscopy performed(%)

 Morning

1236 (25.0)

 Afternoon

3704 (75.0)

Participating Endoscopists(%)

 Senior

1575 (31.9)

 Intermediate

2063 (41.8)

 Junior

1302 (26.3)

Total BBPS score(%)

 0–3(inadequate bowel preparation)

101 (2.1)

 4–5(poor bowel preparation)

885 (17.9)

 6(fair bowel preparation)

1199 (24.3)

 7–8(good bowel preparation)

2381 (48.2)

 9(excellent or perfect bowel preparation)

374 (7.6)

Air bubble score(%)

 0(no air bubble)

1693 (34.3)

 1(minimal bubbles)

1824 (36.9)

 2(moderate amount of air bubbles)

984 (19.9)

 3(large amount of air bubbles)

439 (8.9)

Colonoscopic findings(%)

2115 (42.8)

 Adenoma

1231 (24.9)

 Advanced adenoma

476 (9.6)

 Cancer

104 (2.1)

 Inflammatory bowel disease.

100 (2.0)

 Diverticula

93 (1.9)

 Others

111 (2.2)