Skip to main content

Table 2 Results of the meta-regression and subgroup analyses on shear wave elastography for differentiation of malignant and benign liver lesions

From: Diagnostic effect of shear wave elastography imaging for differentiation of malignant liver lesions: a meta-analysis

Covariates

Subgroup

No.of studies

Pooled SEN

(95% CI)

P value

Pooled SPE

(95% CI)

P value

Meta-Regression Joint P Value

modality

1-pSWE

12

0.82(0.76–0.87)

<0.01

0.83(0.77–0.89)

0.18

0.70

0-2D-SWE

3

0.84(0.75–0.93)

 

0.79(0.66–0.92)

  

location

1-Asian

11

0.82(0.77–0.88)

0.02

0.82(0.76–0.89)

0.05

0.99

0- European or North America

4

0.82(0.72–0.92)

 

0.81(0.71–0.92)

  

gold standard

1-histopathology

3

0.82(0.72–0.92)

0.02

0.85(0.73–0.96)

0.22

0.89

0- histopathology and/or other

12

0.82(0.77–0.88)

 

0.81(0.75–0.88)

  

number of lesions

1- ≥ 100

10

0.84(0.79–0.88)

0.06

0.80(0.73–0.86)

<0.01

0.10

0-<100

5

0.76(0.66–0.87)

 

0.88(0.80–0.97)

  

prevalence of malignant lesions

1- ≥ 50%

11

0.84(0.79–0.88)

0.14

0.81(0.74–0.88)

0.02

0.29

0-<50%

4

0.75(0.63–0.87)

 

0.84(0.74–0.94)

  

blinded

1-yes

11

0.82(0.77–0.88)

0.02

0.81(0.74–0.88)

0.02

0.79

0-unclear

4

0.82(0.72–0.92)

 

0.85(0.75–0.95)

  

attrition rate

1- ≥ 10%

7

0.82(0.77–0.87)

<0.01

0.81(0.74–0.88)

0.04

<0.01

0-<10%

4

0.80(0.75–0.86)

 

0.78(0.69–0.87)

  
  1. SEN sensitivity, SPE specificity