Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Mar 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Masahiro Sogabe
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kuan-Chih Chen
3 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rita Busuttil
15 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Masahiro Sogabe
Resubmission - Version 3
15 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thorsten Brechmann
22 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Masahiro Sogabe
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thorsten Brechmann
25 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keng-Liang Wu
2 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Masahiro Sogabe
Resubmission - Version 5
2 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Masahiro Sogabe
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
15 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
29 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12876-018-0859-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement