Propensity score-matching analysis to compare clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in the postoperative and non-operative stomachs
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 May 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Masaaki Kobayashi|
|14 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Takuji Gotoda|
|25 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ichiro Oda|
|25 Jul 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Mitsuru Esaki|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Jul 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jul 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Mitsuru Esaki|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jul 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 Jul 2018||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12876-018-0855-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.