Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Propensity score-matching analysis to compare clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer in the postoperative and non-operative stomachs

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 May 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masaaki Kobayashi
14 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takuji Gotoda
25 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ichiro Oda
25 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mitsuru Esaki
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Mitsuru Esaki
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
31 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
6 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12876-018-0855-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement