Risk factors for post-ERCP cholecystitis: a single-center retrospective study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Apr 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrich Peitz|
|3 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephan Haas|
|16 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Xiaoping Zou|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrich Peitz|
|7 Jul 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stephan Haas|
|8 Jul 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Jun Cao|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Jul 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Jul 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Jun Cao|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Jul 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|31 Jul 2018||Editorially accepted|
|22 Aug 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12876-018-0854-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.