Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Faecal calprotectin level for assessing endoscopic activity and predicting future clinical course in patients with moderately active ulcerative colitis undergoing granulomonocytapheresis: a prospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Mar 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
20 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Lehmann
21 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Renata D'Inca
27 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Takahiro Shimoyama
Resubmission - Version 2
27 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Renata D'Inca
2 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Lehmann
13 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Takahiro Shimoyama
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Takahiro Shimoyama
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
25 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12876-018-0853-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement