Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 The associations of RS, GBS and AIMS65 scores with the risk of in-hospital death among 799 UGIB participants in Nanjing, China

From: Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China

Scoring system Death n (%) Score values (Mean ± SD) Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI) Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
RS No 774 (96.9) 2.86 ± 1.78 1 1
Yes 25 (3.1) 4.88 ± 1.90 1.72 (1.38, 2.13) 1.60 (1.20, 2.13)a
GBS No 774 (96.9) 8.31 ± 3.64 1 1
Yes 25 (3.1) 11.24 ± 4.02 1.31 (1.14, 1.50) 1.09 (0.93, 1.27)b
AIMS65 No 774 (96.9) 0.69 ± 0.99 1 1
Yes 25 (3.1) 2.00 ± 1.00 8.24(4.67, 14.54) 14.72 (6.48, 33.43)c
  1. aRS: Adjusted for gender, Hb, Albumin, BUN, INR, Mental status/ Syncope, PT and PLT
  2. bGBS: Adjusted for age, gender, Albumin, INR, PT, PLT and endoscopic findings
  3. cAIMS65: Adjusted for gender, Hb, BUN, heart rate, co-morbidity, PT, PLT and endoscopic findings