Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow–Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China

Table 3 The associations of RS, GBS and AIMS65 scores with the risk of in-hospital death among 799 UGIB participants in Nanjing, China

Scoring system	Death	n (%)	Score values (Mean ± SD)	Unadjusted odds ratio (95% CI)	Adjusted odds ratio (95% CI)
RS	No	774 (96.9)	2.86 ± 1.78	1	1
RS	Yes	25 (3.1)	4.88 ± 1.90	1.72 (1.38, 2.13)	1.60 (1.20, 2.13)^a
GBS	No	774 (96.9)	8.31 ± 3.64	1	1
GBS	Yes	25 (3.1)	11.24 ± 4.02	1.31 (1.14, 1.50)	1.09 (0.93, 1.27)^b
AIMS65	No	774 (96.9)	0.69 ± 0.99	1	1
AIMS65	Yes	25 (3.1)	2.00 ± 1.00	8.24(4.67, 14.54)	14.72 (6.48, 33.43)^c

^aRS: Adjusted for gender, Hb, Albumin, BUN, INR, Mental status/ Syncope, PT and PLT
^bGBS: Adjusted for age, gender, Albumin, INR, PT, PLT and endoscopic findings
^cAIMS65: Adjusted for gender, Hb, BUN, heart rate, co-morbidity, PT, PLT and endoscopic findings

ISSN: 1471-230X