Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Clinical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection for rectal neuroendocrine tumor

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 May 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chang Mo Moon
10 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masau Sekiguchi
18 Nov 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Satoshi Nagayama
21 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jihye Kim
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chang Mo Moon
23 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Satoshi Nagayama
8 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Masau Sekiguchi
11 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Jihye Kim
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
23 May 2018 Editorially accepted
5 Jun 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12876-018-0806-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement