Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “Appropriateness of colonoscopy according to EPAGE II in a low resource setting: a cross sectional study from Sri Lanka”

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Roberts-Thomson
30 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Cummins
22 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yasara Samarakoon
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adrian Cummins
2 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yasara Samarakoon
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David N. Lewin
30 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yasara Samarakoon
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yasara Samarakoon
Resubmission - Version 5
9 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 May 2018 Editorially accepted
29 May 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12876-018-0798-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement