Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Bleeding in patients who underwent scheduled second-look endoscopy 5 days after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Jan 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesca Galuppini
29 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bhavana Bhagya Rao
24 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Izumikawa
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bhavana Bhagya Rao
7 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesca Galuppini
8 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Izumikawa
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesca Galuppini
27 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Koichi Izumikawa
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
10 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12876-018-0774-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement