Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate survival analysis results of 164 patients with GC at early stage

From: The red distribution width and the platelet distribution width as prognostic predictors in gastric cancer

Variables

Univariatea (OS)

Univariatea (DFS)

Multivariateb(DFS)

HR(95% CI)

P value

HR(95% CI)

P value

HR(95% CI)

P value

RDW(<12.85/≥12.85)

57.198(0.042–7.805E4)

0.272

5.776(1.292–25.821)

0.022

5.346(1.195–23.917)

0.028

PDW(<11.95/≥11.95)

0.265 (0.029–2.387)

0.236

0.158(0.035–0.707)

0.016

0.170(0.038–0.761)

0.020

Gender(Male/Female)

1.526 (0.158–14.733)

0.715

2.983(0.973–9.150)

0.056

  

Age(<60/≥60)

2.264 (0.242–21.168)

0.474

1.145(0.378–3.470)

0.811

  

Tumor diameter(≤4/>4)

0.046 (0.000–1.144E7)

0.754

2.507(0.318–19.758)

0.383

  

Differentiation (Well/Moderate/ Poor)

2.384 (0.487–11.664)

0.284

0.717(0.334–1.540)

0.394

  

Lymph node metastasis (N0/N1 + N2 + N3)

1.460 (0.201–10.620)

0.708

1.706(0.513–5.671)

0.383

  

Distance metastasis (M0/M1)

0.047(0.000–1.212E9)

0.803

0.047(0.000–1.401E4)

0.634

  

pStage(I + II/III + IV)

2.243 (0.250–20.161)

0.471

1.478(0.330–6.615)

0.609

  

CEA(≤5/>5)

0.045 (0.000–2.044E14)

0.602

0.046(0.000–3.688E4)

0.657

  

CA125(≤35/>35)

1.000(0.000–2584.626)

1.000

0.046(0.000–4.070E7)

0.770

  

CA199(≤39/>39)

0.039 (0.000–5.365E7)

0.762

0.042(0.000–1.509E4)

0.627

  
  1. Abbreviations: OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, RDW red blood cell distribution width, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125 carbohydrate antigen 125, CA199 carbohydrate antigen 199
  2. aPerformed using the Kaplan–Meier analysis model and the log-rank test; values of P < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate analysis
  3. bperformed using Cox proportional hazards models with the forward likelihood method