Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate survival analysis results of 164 patients with GC at early stage

From: The red distribution width and the platelet distribution width as prognostic predictors in gastric cancer

Variables Univariatea (OS) Univariatea (DFS) Multivariateb(DFS)
HR(95% CI) P value HR(95% CI) P value HR(95% CI) P value
RDW(<12.85/≥12.85) 57.198(0.042–7.805E4) 0.272 5.776(1.292–25.821) 0.022 5.346(1.195–23.917) 0.028
PDW(<11.95/≥11.95) 0.265 (0.029–2.387) 0.236 0.158(0.035–0.707) 0.016 0.170(0.038–0.761) 0.020
Gender(Male/Female) 1.526 (0.158–14.733) 0.715 2.983(0.973–9.150) 0.056   
Age(<60/≥60) 2.264 (0.242–21.168) 0.474 1.145(0.378–3.470) 0.811   
Tumor diameter(≤4/>4) 0.046 (0.000–1.144E7) 0.754 2.507(0.318–19.758) 0.383   
Differentiation (Well/Moderate/ Poor) 2.384 (0.487–11.664) 0.284 0.717(0.334–1.540) 0.394   
Lymph node metastasis (N0/N1 + N2 + N3) 1.460 (0.201–10.620) 0.708 1.706(0.513–5.671) 0.383   
Distance metastasis (M0/M1) 0.047(0.000–1.212E9) 0.803 0.047(0.000–1.401E4) 0.634   
pStage(I + II/III + IV) 2.243 (0.250–20.161) 0.471 1.478(0.330–6.615) 0.609   
CEA(≤5/>5) 0.045 (0.000–2.044E14) 0.602 0.046(0.000–3.688E4) 0.657   
CA125(≤35/>35) 1.000(0.000–2584.626) 1.000 0.046(0.000–4.070E7) 0.770   
CA199(≤39/>39) 0.039 (0.000–5.365E7) 0.762 0.042(0.000–1.509E4) 0.627   
  1. Abbreviations: OS overall survival, DFS disease-free survival, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, RDW red blood cell distribution width, CEA carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125 carbohydrate antigen 125, CA199 carbohydrate antigen 199
  2. aPerformed using the Kaplan–Meier analysis model and the log-rank test; values of P < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate analysis
  3. bperformed using Cox proportional hazards models with the forward likelihood method