Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of five tumor regression grading systems for gastric adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective study of 192 cases from National Cancer Center in China

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chikara Kunisaki
9 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - C Gutschow
12 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Zhou Zhi-wei
22 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yuelu Zhu
Resubmission - Version 6
1 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
8 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12876-017-0598-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement