Skip to main content

Table 2 Incidence of Upper Gastric Cancer in Different Age Groups in Females

From: Should every region use the same gastric cancer scanning and treatment approaches? let’s reconsider: a northeastern turkey example

  Site
Eo GCaF and Co GCo GCoA GA D Total
Age group
 Under 45 n 10 23 3 12 1 2 51
  % wag 19.6 45.1 5.9 23.5 2.0 3.9 100 %
  % ws 8.6 14.8 9.4 18.5 1.9 33.3 11.9 %
  % T 2.3 5.4 0.7 2.8 0.2 0.5 11.9 %
 46–55 n 13 15 8 6 12 1 55
  % wag 23.6 27.3 14.5 10.9 21.8 1.8 100 %
  % ws 11.2 9.7 25.0 9.2 22.6 16.7 12.9 %
  % T 3.0 3.5 1.9 1.4 2.8 0.2 12.9 %
 56–65 n 51 43 8 3 18 1 124
  % wag 41.1 34.7 6.5 2.4 14.5 0.8 100 %
  % ws 44.0 27.7 25.0 4.6 34.0 16.7 29.0 %
  % T 11.9 10.1 1.9 0.7 4.2 0.2 29.0 %
 66–75 n 32 39 12 27 10 1 121
  % wag 26.4 32.2 9.9 22.3 8.3 0.8 100 %
  % ws 27.6 25.2 37.5 41.5 18.9 16.7 28.3 %
% T 7.5 9.1 2.8 6.3 2.3 0.2 28.3 %
 75 + n 10 35 1 17 12 1 76
  % wag 13.2 46.1 1.3 22.4 15.8 1.3 100 %
  % ws 8.6 22.6 3.1 26.2 22.6 16.7 17.8 %
  % T 2.3 8.2 0.2 4.0 2.8 0.2 17.8 %
  n 116 155 32 65 53 6 427
  % wag 27.2 36.3 7.5 15.2 12.4 1.4 100 %
  % ws 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 %
  % T 27.2 36.3 7.5 15.2 12.4 1.4 100 %
  1. wag with in age group, ws with in site, T total, n frequency, Eo esophageal, GCaF and Co Cardia and fundus or corpus or all of them, GCo corpus, GCoA corpus and antrum, GA antrum, D duodenum