Skip to main content

Table 4 The prevalence of different HBV genotypes in our study compared to previously published studies

From: Distribution and clinical significance of hepatitis B virus genotypes in Pakistan

Source

Place of sampling

Sample size

Proportion of genotype as percent of total samples

A

B

C

D

E

F

Mix

Mixed combinations

UT

Hanif et al., 2013 [5]

Karachi, Islamabad/Rawalpindi

200 (40, 160)

10

-

-

59

-

-

31

A + D

-

Awan et al., 2010 [18]

Punjab, KP, Sind, Baluchistan

300 (222, 36, 26, 15)

14

18

28

13

0.6

1.3

16

A + B + D, A + D + F, A + C, A + D, A + E, A + F, B + C, B + E, C + D

10.3

Ahmed et al., 2009 [39]

Punjab, Sind

236

0.8

-

5.9

93.2

-

-

-

-

-

Baig et al., 2009 [32]

Karachi

315

20

-

-

70

-

-

10

A + D

-

Noorali et al., 2008 [31]

Karachi

180

-

-

-

84

-

-

16

B + D

-

Hakim et al., 2008 [38]

Karachi

180

-

-

-

84

-

-

16

B + D

-

Alam et al., 2007 [30]

Punjab, KP, Sind Baluchistan

110 (30, 28, 25, 18)

4.5

24.5

-

60

-

-

2.7

A + D, B + D

8.2

Abbas et al., 2006 [37]

Karachi

109

-

-

-

98.2

-

-

1.8

A + D

-

Idrees et al., 2004 [34]

Punjab, KP, Sind Baluchistan

112 (Details not available)

21.4

17.9

41.1

8.0

-

-

7.1

Details not available

4.5

Naaz, 2001 [33]

Lahore

12

-

-

75

25

-

-

-

-

-

This study

Punjab, KP, Sind, Baluchistan, AJK, Gilgit-Baltistan

715 (311, 99, 84, 60, 68, 93)

7.7

0.6

0.8

71.2

0.1

-

17.3

A + D, B + D, C + D, A + B, A + B + D, E + D

2.2

  1. UT stands for Un-typable