Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for constipation: a right attitude towards to guidelines

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Aug 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Uday Ghoshal
3 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Askin Erdogan
6 Sep 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Sep 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Uday Ghoshal
7 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Askin Erdogan
9 Oct 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Oct 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Uday Ghoshal
20 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 5
14 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 6
14 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 6
24 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 7
24 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 7
12 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hongliang Tian
Resubmission - Version 8
12 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
25 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
4 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12876-016-0466-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement