This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of the effectiveness of polyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes in constipation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
© Katelaris et al. 2016
Received: 1 October 2015
Accepted: 19 March 2016
Published: 31 March 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siddharth Singh|
|18 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nick Burr|
|20 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Katelaris|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Katelaris|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|31 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12876-016-0457-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.