Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Oct 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luit Penninga
17 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Mavridis
21 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramon Gorter
22 Dec 2015 Author responded Author comments - Tomohiko Ukai
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Dec 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Luit Penninga
30 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramon Gorter
27 Jan 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Mavridis
9 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Tomohiko Ukai
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Mar 2016 Editorially accepted
15 Mar 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement