Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luit Penninga|
|17 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Mavridis|
|21 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ramon Gorter|
|22 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Tomohiko Ukai|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Luit Penninga|
|30 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ramon Gorter|
|27 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dimitrios Mavridis|
|9 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Tomohiko Ukai|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Mar 2016||Editorially accepted|
|15 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12876-016-0453-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.