Skip to main content

Table 3 Multiple linear regression analysis of the association of caffeinated coffee consumption with markers of liver injury when individuals consuming ≥ 1 alcoholic drink/day were excluded

From: Associations of coffee consumption with markers of liver injury in the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study

Outcome per unit increase in caffeinated coffee

ALTab

ASTab

Fetuin-Aac

NAFLD liver fat scoread

 

β (95 % CI)

p value

β (95 % CI)

p value

β (95 % CI)

p value

β (95 % CI)

p value

Model 1

−0.10 (−0.17, −0.03)

0.0046

−0.05 (−0.10, −0.01)

0.0280

0.02 (−0.04, 0.08)

0.47

−0.07 (−0.13, −0.02)

0.0070

Model 2

−0.11 (−0.18, −0.03)

0.0037

−0.05 (−0.10, −0.00)

0.0420

0.02 (−0.04, 0.08)

0.54

−0.06 (−0.11, −0.01)

0.0189

Model 3

−0.11 (−0.18, −0.04)

0.0037

−0.05 (−0.10, −0.00)

0.0330

0.03 (−0.04, 0.09)

0.41

−0.06 (−0.11, −0.01)

0.0298

Model 4

−0.08 (−0.16, −0.00)

0.0400

−0.03 (−0.08, 0.02)

0.20

0.03 (−0.04, 0.09)

0.44

−0.03 (−0.07, 0.02)

0.27

  1. Model 1: Age, sex, ethnicity
  2. Model 2: Adjusted as in model 1 + energy intake, energy expenditure, education, BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption
  3. Model 3: Adjusted as in model 2 + whole grain consumption, vegetable intake, fruit intake, % energy from saturated fat, % energy from polyunsaturated fat, decaffeinated coffee consumption, regular soft drinks, lemonade/sweetened mineral water
  4. Model 4: Adjusted as in model 3 + insulin sensitivity
  5. aLog transformation;b n = 827 with slight variation across models;cn = 541 with slight variation across models; dn = 821 with slight variation across models