Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Effect of antecolic or retrocolic reconstruction of the gastro/duodenojejunostomy on delayed gastric emptying after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis

Reference (Year)

Enrolment interval (country)

Group

No. of patients (M /F)

Mean age (years)

Disease Ma/Be

Type of operation

Quality score

Tani et al. [7] (2006)

2002-2004 (Japan)

Antecolic

20 (11/9)

63.1 ± 9.21

16/4

All PPPD

2

Retrocolic

20 (10/10)

66.7 ± 12.2

16/4

All PPPD

Gangavatiker et al. [10] (2011)

2006-2008 (India)

Antecolic

32 (23/9)

52.8 ± 11.6

27/5

PPPD:10; CPD:22

2

Retrocolic

36 (26/10)

50.8 ± 10.6

32/4

PPPD:14; CPD:22

Imamura et al. [11] (2013)

2005-2011 (Japan)

Antecolic

58 (36/22)

70.0 (36–86)

46/12

All PPPD

2

Retrocolic

58 (32/26)

69.0 (46–86)

49/9

All PPPD

Eshuis et al. [12] (2013)

2009-2011 (the Netherlands)

Antecolic

121 (83/38)

65.4 ± 9.0

108/13

PPPD:93; CPD:28

2

Retrocolic

125 (68/57)

65.2 ± 10.3

119/6

PPPD:105; CPD:20

Tamandl et al. [13] (2013)

2007-2009 (Austria)

Antecolic

36 (17/19)

67.1 (55.7–75.3)

28/8

All PPPD

2

Retrocolic

28 (12/16)

65.4 (55.6–70.6)

20/8

All PPPD

  1. M /F, Male/Female; Ma/Be, Malignant/benign; PPPD, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy; CPD, classic pancreaticoduodenectomy