Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparisons of GERD patients with versus without IPF (mean ± SD)

From: The prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease and esophageal dysmotility in Chinese patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Items

GERD with IPF

GERD without IPF

Independent-Sample t test

N = 43

N = 88

Age

57.9 ± 10.2

54.2 ± 12.3

P = 0.097

Gender

19/24

39/49

P = 0.989

LESP (mean ± SD)

16.7 ± 9.4

16.3 ± 11.7

P = 0.811

LESRP (mean ± SD)

4.0 ± 5.0

4.8 ± 4.5

P = 0.372

IRP (mean ± SD)

8.2 ± 5.1

7.9 ± 5.6

P = 0.717

UESP (mean ± SD)

66.3 ± 16.5

78.0 ± 29.6

P = 0.018

DEA (mean ± SD)

59.3 ± 37.0

61.6 ± 31.3

P = 0.713

DCI (mean ± SD)

792.2 ± 838.3

592.4 ± 746.4

P = 0.169

Peristalsis n (%)

Normal

24 (55.8)

53 (60.2)

P = 0.630

Weak

19 (44.1)

35 (39.8)

 

TBTT s

7.4 ± 1.6

7.0 ± 1.3

P = 0.115

CBTR %

56.0 ± 37.0

69.4 ± 34.0

P < 0.001

Acid exposure (pH)

Percent time (%)

 

Upright

6.4 ± 8.2

5.4 ± 5.7

P = 0.405

Recumbent

4.3 ± 5.9

2.6 ± 4.2

P = 0.099

Total

4.8 ± 4.2

4.2 ± 3.8

P = 0.403

DeMeester score

15.9 ± 12.6

15.0 ± 12.8

P = 0.713

Bolus exposure

All reflux time (%)

 

Upright

4.6 ± 3.4

3.0 ± 2.5

P = 0.008

Recumbent

1.5 ± 2.1

0.6 ± 1.3

P = 0.022

Total

2.8 ± 2.0

1.9 ± 1.7

P < 0.009

 

Reflux Episodes Activity

 

Distal

Acid

21.1 ± 11.3

21.3 ± 14.8

P = 0.927

Reflux

Nonacid

24.3 ± 14.8

20.1 ± 14.5

P = 0.199

n

Total

45.5 ± 17.9

41.4 ± 23.7

P = 0.326

Proximal

Acid

13.0 ± 9.2

12.1 ± 10.1

P = 0.523

Reflux

Nonacid

11.0 ± 8.5

11.1 ± 10.6

P = 0.615

n

Total

24.3 ± 14.8

23.1 ± 17.3

P = 0.951

  1. GERD: gastro-esophageal reflux disease; IPF: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; LESP: lower esophageal sphincter pressure; LESRP: lower esophageal sphincter residual pressure; IRP: integrated relaxation pressure. UESP: upper esophageal sphincter pressure; DCI: distal contractile integral; DEA: distal esophageal amplitude; TBTT: total bolus transmit time; CBTR: complete bolus transit rate.