Open Peer Review Reports for: Mutational profiles of different macroscopic subtypes of colorectal adenoma reveal distinct pathogenetic roles for KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sep 2014 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
| 10 Nov 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Yutaka Saito |
| 10 Nov 2014 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Takahisa Matsuda |
| 1 Dec 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Li-Chun Chang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 1 Dec 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 11 Dec 2014 | Author responded | Author comments - Li-Chun Chang |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Dec 2014 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 12 Dec 2014 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Dec 2014 | Article published | 10.1186/s12876-014-0221-y |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
