Skip to main content

Table 4 Means for the assessment of intestinal permeability (functional tests, bacteria-related tests)

From: Intestinal permeability – a new target for disease prevention and therapy

Means

Hu

An

Test molecules

Test site

Material needed

Disadvantages

Ex vivo

Ussing chamber

x

x

H2O, ions, sugars etc.,

site specific

biopsies

invasive

In vivo – permeability assays

Lactulose/mannitol

x

x

oligosaccharides of different MW

small intestine

urine

time consuming

Sucralose

x

(x)

sucralose(comb.)*

colon

urine

time consuming

Sucrose

x

(x)

sucrose(comb.)*

stomach

urine

time consuming

PEG4000/400

x

(x)

polyethylene glycols

whole intestine

urine

time consuming

51Cr-EDTA

x

x

51Cr-EDTA

whole intestine

urine

radio-activity

In vivo – bacteria-related

LAL assay

x

x

endotoxin (LPS)

whole intestine

plasma

assay limitation

EndoCAb

x

x

anti-LPS antibodies

whole intestine

serum

only in acute phase

D-lactate

x

x

bacterial lactate

whole intestine

plasma

low specificity

Butyrate production

x

x

BPB (PCR)

colon

feces

special labs, limited data

Hemolysin test

x

x

pathogens (cell culture)

colon

feces

special labs, limited data

Inner colon mucus

x

x

quantification of bacteria

colon

biopsies

invasive,limited standardization

Liver steatosis

x

x

fat content in the liver

whole intestine

MRT, US

expensive unspecific

Breath tests

x

x

fat content in the liver

whole intestine

GC/MS

unclear specificity

  1. Abbreviations: Hu suitable for the human system, An suitable for animal models, 51Cr-EDTA chromium labeled EDTA, BPB butyrate-producing bacteria, EndoCAb circulating endotoxin core antibodies, GC gas chromatography, LAL limulus amebocyte lysate assay, LPS lipopolysaccharide, MRT magnetic resonance tomography, MS mass spectroscopy, PEG polyethylene glycols, US ultrasound. *in combination with Lactulose/mannitol test.