This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A comparison of diagnostic tests for lactose malabsorption - which one is the best?
© Hovde and Farup; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 27 June 2009
Accepted: 31 October 2009
Published: 31 October 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Jun 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonio Tursi|
|28 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Piero Vernia|
|27 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Per G Farup|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonio Tursi|
|19 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Piero Vernia|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Oct 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Per G Farup|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|26 Oct 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|31 Oct 2009||Editorially accepted|
|31 Oct 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-9-82|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.