Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessment of safety and feasibility of a new technical variant of gastropexy for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: an experience with 435 cases

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Jan 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hugo Heij
27 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arno Dormann
1 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Paulo Campoli
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hugo Heij
29 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Paulo Campoli
Resubmission - Version 3
29 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Paulo Campoli
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
26 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-9-48

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement