Skip to main content

Table 2 P-RFA vs. PEI: Results of meta-analysis

From: Meta-analysis of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation versus ethanol injection in hepatocellular carcinoma

Variables

No. of studies furnishing data

Results

RR/WMD (95% CI) P-value

I2

  

RFA

PEI

  

Baseline characteristics:

     

Child-Pugh grade of liver dysfunction

A

B

624,26–30

624,26–30

71%

24%

70%

26%

1.05 (0.97, 1.13), 0.44

0.92 (0.74, 1.15), 0.43

0%

0%

Tumour size, cm (mean ± SEM)

426–28,30

2.62 ± 0.33

2.47 ± 0.35

0.13 (0.01, 0.25),0.03

0%

Single nodule

624,26–30

59%

55%

1.04 (0.94, 1.50), 0.44

17%

Follow-up duration, months (mean ± SEM)

326–28

25 ± 6.2

23.6 ± 5.6

0.97 (-1.32, 3.3), 0.4

0%

Efficacy:

     

Survival

1 year

2 years

3 years

4 years

526–30

526–30

427–30

229,30

96%

86%

73%

62%

91%

75%

58%

51%

1.04 (1.007, 1.08), 0.02

1.13 (1.06, 1.20), <0.001

1.28 (1.12, 1.45), <0.001

1.24 (1.05,1.48), <0.001

0%

0%

12.6%

0%

Local recurrence

426–29

7%

22%

0.37 (0.23, 0.59), 0.000

0%

Disease-free survival

1 year

2 years

3 years

326–28

326–28

227,28

80%

61%

40%

70%

42%

19%

1.13 (1, 1.28), 0.04

1.31 (1.06, 1.61), 0.013

2.1 (1.35, 3.23), 0.001

0%

0%

0%

Tumour complete response

424,26–28

93.5%

84.5%

1.10 (1.04, 1.17), 0.01

0%

Remote intra-hepatic recurrence

526–30

43%

45%

0.97 (0.82, 1.11), 0.56

0%

Safety:

     

Total complications

624,26–30

19.2%

10.5%

2.55 (1.8, 3.65), <0.001

0%

Major complications

424,28–30

4.1%

2.7%

1.85 (0.68, 5.01); 0.22

0%

  1. RR: Relative risk. WMD: Weighted mean difference. All based on random effects meta-analysis.