Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Predictors of gallstone composition in 1025 symptomatic gallstones from Northern Germany

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Jul 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karel van Erpecum
20 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulf Gustafsson
26 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jochen Hampe
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karel van Erpecum
13 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulf Gustafsson
15 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jochen Hampe
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jochen Hampe
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Jochen Hampe
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Nov 2006 Editorially accepted
22 Nov 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-6-36

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement