Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparison of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine in reducing complications of duodenal peptic ulcer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jan 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
28 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xavier Calvet
3 Apr 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fook Hong Ng
17 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Manoochehr Khoshbaten
Resubmission - Version 2
17 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xavier Calvet
8 Jul 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fook Hong Ng
11 Aug 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marika Mikelsaar
30 Aug 2005 Author responded Author comments - Manoochehr Khoshbaten
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Aug 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
11 Oct 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Xavier Calvet
5 Nov 2005 Author responded Author comments - Manoochehr Khoshbaten
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Nov 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Dec 2005 Author responded Author comments - Manoochehr Khoshbaten
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Dec 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Jan 2006 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-6-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement