This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Discussing the influence of electrode location in the result of esophageal prolonged pH monitoring
© Felix et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 30 March 2013
Accepted: 28 March 2014
Published: 4 April 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Valter Nilton Felix|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - mate knabe|
|28 Aug 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hendrik Manner|
|18 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Valter Nilton Felix|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|24 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - mate knabe|
|22 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Valter Nilton Felix|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Mar 2014||Editorially accepted|
|4 Apr 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-14-64|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.