Skip to main content

Table 3 Sensitivity analysis

From: Covered versus uncovered self-expandable metallic stents for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Primary outcome

No. studies

No. patients

Rate (%) (Covered⁄Uncovered)

RR⁄WMD (95% CI)

P-value

High quality studies(Star ≥ 5)

 

Technical success rate

7

675

99.0/100

0.99 [0.98, 1.01]

0.51

Clinical success rate

6

650

91.4/85.8

1.04 [0.98, 1.11]

0.18

Post-stenting GOOSS

6

451

-

−0.01 [−0.52, 0.50]*

0.96

Stent pantency

5

590

-

−0.05 [−1.50, 1.39]*

0.94

Stent migration

7

662

16.3/3.3

3.49 [1.92, 6.32]

<0.0001

Stent obstruction

7

662

6.8/20.4

0.39 [0.18, 0.84]

0.02

Overall complications

6

508

50.0/44.7

1.11 [0.86, 1.44]

0.43

Reintervention rate

6

600

21.3/16.3

1.30 [0.92, 1.83]

0.13

Studies containing ≥ 70 patients

 

Technical success rate

5

660

98.9/100

1.00 [0.98, 1.01]

0.53

Clinical success rate

4

528

92.6/84.6

1.08 [0.99, 1.18]

0.08

Post-stenting GOOSS

3

304

-

0.26 [−0.05, 0.48]*

0.06

Stent pantency

4

528

-

0.62 [−0.06, 1.18]*

0.07

Stent migration

5

647

20.1/4.3

4.00 [2.05, 7.80]

<0.0001

Stent obstruction

5

647

6.6/20.6

0.35 [0.17, 0.74]

0.006

Overall complications

4

493

53.9/43.6

1.22 [0.99, 1.51]

0.06

Reintervention rate

4

515

21.7/17.7

1.25 [0.88, 1.78]

0.21

  1. R, retrospective trial; P, prospective trial; RCT, randomized control trial.
  2. *, WMD (95%CI).
  3. GOOSS, gastric outlet obstruction scoring system.