Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparable outcome of liver transplantation with Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate vs. University of Wisconsin preservation solution: a retrospective observational double-center trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Mar 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Kaltenborn
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 May 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Homan Wai
9 Jun 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Lam
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Jul 2014 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Kaltenborn
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jul 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Kaltenborn
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
20 Aug 2014 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Kaltenborn
Resubmission - Version 6
20 Aug 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Alexander Kaltenborn
Resubmission - Version 7
2 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
12 Sep 2014 Editorially accepted
28 Sep 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-14-169

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement