This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Intestinal biopsy is not always required to diagnose celiac disease: a retrospective analysis of combined antibody tests
© Bürgin-Wolff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 13 March 2012
Accepted: 14 January 2013
Published: 23 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Faruk Hadziselimovic|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|19 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jocelyn Silvester|
|2 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julio Bai|
|13 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xavier Bossuyt|
|13 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Faruk Hadziselimovic|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jocelyn Silvester|
|5 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xavier Bossuyt|
|29 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Faruk Hadziselimovic|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-13-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.