IgG4 Related disease – a retrospective descriptive study highlighting Canadian experiences in diagnosis and management
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terumi Kamisawa|
|17 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Myung-Hwan Kim|
|17 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Raffaele Pezzilli|
|28 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siddharth Singh|
|13 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Harshna Patel|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Raffaele Pezzilli|
|16 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Siddharth Singh|
|21 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Terumi Kamisawa|
|4 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Myung-Hwan Kim|
|25 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Harshna Patel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|9 Dec 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-13-168|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.