Skip to main content

Table 1 Correlation between number of laparostomy revisions and clinical parameters observed at first laparotomy (excluding patients who died or who were lost at follow-up after first laparotomy)

From: Comparative analysis of primary repair vs resection and anastomosis, with laparostomy, in management of typhoid intestinal perforation: results of a rural hospital in northwestern Benin

Number of revisions

p

 

1

2

3

4

>4

Age (average)

18.2

17.0

22.2

13

18

0.61

Number of perforations at initial surgery (average)

1.89

1.51

1.63

2

2.06

0.92

Distance from the ileocaecal valve

 < 30 cm (55 cases)

17

18

7

1

12

0.07

(30.9%)

(32.7%)

(12.7%)

(1.8%)

(21.8%)

 

 20-30 cm (35 cases)

8

14

5

1

7

0.09

(22.8%)

(40%)

(14.2%)

(2.8%)

(20%)

 > 30 cm (5 cases)

0

3

2

0

0

0.06

(60%)

(40%)

Type of initial surgery

 Primary repair (54 cases)

15

22

10

0

7

0.005

(27.7%)

(40.7%)

(18.%)

(12.9%)

 Resection and anastomosis (16 cases)

3

3

1

1

8

0.023

(18.7%)

(18.7%)

(6.2%)

(6.2%)

(50%)

WBC (average) at initial surgery

7706

10500

10222

10750

0.58

Hb (average) at initial surgery

9.7

10.2

10.1

9.8

0.37