Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Back-to-Back Comparison of Auto-Fluorescence Imaging (AFI) Versus High Resolution White Light Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takahisa Matsuda
5 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gianluca Rotondano
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mikihiro Fujiya
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mikihiro Fujiya
Resubmission - Version 4
21 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Takahisa Matsuda
11 Mar 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gianluca Rotondano
30 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mikihiro Fujiya
Resubmission - Version 5
30 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mikihiro Fujiya
Resubmission - Version 6
30 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
30 May 2012 Author responded Author comments - Mikihiro Fujiya
Resubmission - Version 7
30 May 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
22 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
22 Jun 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-12-75

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement