Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics, characteristics of strictures, indications for stent placement and baseline dysphagia scores

From: A comparison of the temporary placement of 3 different self-expanding stents for the treatment of refractory benign esophageal strictures: a prospective multicentre study

 

SEPS (n = 10)

BD Stent (N = 10)

FCSEMS (n = 10)

 P 

Sex, n (%)

   

0.53

Male

5 (50%)

4 (40%)

7 (70%)

 

Female

5 (50%)

6 (60%)

3 (30%)

 

Age (years), mean (range)

52.7 (28–67)

57.2 (42–79)

50.7 (27–78)

0.63

Characteristics of stricture

Lenght (cm), mean (range)

2.9 (1–5)

2.9 (1–8)

2.8 (1–6)

0.91

Location, n (%)

   

0.14

Upper Esophagus

-

-

2 (20%)

 

Mid esophagus

2 (20%)

-

2 (20%)

 

Lower esophagus

4 (40%)

4 (40%)

3 (30%)

 

Anastomotic

4 (40%)

6 (40%)

3 (30%)

 

Indication for stent placement,

   

0.2

n (%)

    

Peptic stricture

1 (10%)

3 (30%)

3 (30%)

 

Caustic

1 (10%)

1 (10%)

1 (10%)

 

Radiation induced

2 (10%)

-

-

 

Post-surgical

4 (40%)

6 (10%)

3 (30%)

 

Idiophatic

2 (20%)

-

3 (30%)

 

Dysphagia score before stent placement, mean (±SD)

2.8 (0.42)

2.8 (0.42)

2.7 (0.48)

0.84

  1. SEPS Self-expandable plastic stent, BD Biodegradable, FCSEMS Fully cover self-expandable metal stent.