Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalence of fine mucosal structures and micro vascular patterns seen by magnying NBI, among gastric protruding/or polypoid lesion, and diagnostic efficacy of those patterns for GN

From: Correlation between magnifying narrow band imaging and histopathology in gastric protruding/or polypoid lesions: a pilot feasibility trial

 

Histopathological diagnosis

Diagnostic efficacy for GN

 

FGP

HP

GN

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

Fine mucosal structures

Small round

18(94.7)

2(4.3)

3(10.3)

10.3

69.7

Prolonged

0(0)

15(31.9)

1(3.5)

3.5

77.3

Villous or ridge

1(5.3)

30(63.8)

20.(69.0)

69.0

53.0

Unclear

0(0)

0(0)

5(17.2)

17.2

100

Micro vascular patterns

Honey comb

18(94.7)

2(4.3)

0(0)

0

69.7

Dense vascular

0(0)

44(93.6)

4(13.8)

13.8

33.3

Core vascular

1(5.3)

1(2.1)

21(72.4)

72.4

97.0

Fine net work

0(0)

0(0)

3(10.3)

10.3

100

Unclear

0(0)

0(0)

1(3.5)

3.5

100

Combined of fine mucosal structures and micro vascular patterns

 

Small round/Honey comb

18(94.7)

2(4.3)

0(0)

0

69.7

Prolonged/Dense vascular

0(0)

14(29.8)

0(0)

0

78.8

Villous or ridge/Dense vascular

0(0)

30(63.8)

4(13.8)

13.8

54.5

Small round/Fine net work

0(0)

0(0)

3(10.3)

10.3

100

Prolonged/Core vascular

0(0)

0(0)

1(3.5)

3.5

100

Villous or ridge/Core vascular

1(5.3)

1(2.1)

16(55.2)

55.2

97.0

Unclear/Core vascular

0(0)

0(0)

4(13.8)

13.8

100

Unclear/Unclear

0(0)

0(0)

1(3.5)

3.5

100

  1. FGP fundic grand polyps; HP, hyperplastic polyps; GN, gastric neoplasia; ND, not done
  2. Most favourable combination of micro vascular pattern for diagnosing GN were; Core vascular+ fine network+ unclear: sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 97.0%
  3. Most favourable combination of fine mucosal structures and micro vascular pattern for diagnosing GN were; small round/fine net work+ prolonged/core vascular+ villous or ridge/core vascular+ unclear/core vascular+ unclear: sensitivity 86.2%, specificity 9.0%