Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Lejeune
16 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sujha Subramanian
19 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Guy Launoy
24 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kelvin Tsoi
19 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Ho
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Ho
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kelvin Tsoi
22 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sujha Subramanian
13 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Ho
Resubmission - Version 4
13 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kelvin Tsoi
23 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Ho
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Ho
Resubmission - Version 6
13 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
24 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Samuel Ho
Resubmission - Version 8
24 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
25 Aug 2011 Editorially accepted
25 Aug 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-11-93

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement