Skip to main content

Table 2 Relation between typical enhancement pattern for hemangioma in successive phases of dynamic CT/MR studies (homogeneous enhancement in HAP, PVP and EP or nodular peripheral/globular enhancement in HAP with progressive fill-in enhancement in PVP and EP) and detectable lesions in three groups: small, large and all lesions.

From: Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?

Groups and subgroups Homogeneous enhancement in HAP, PVP and EP (number of foci) Nodular peripheral/globular enhancement in HAP with progressive fill-in enhancement in PVP and EP (number of foci)
small HH-group 30 9
small nonHH-group 20 1
large HH-group 11 25
large nonHH-group 5 5
all size HH-group 41 34
all size nonHH-group 25 6