Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development of a validated patient-reported symptom metric for pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis: qualitative methods

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Apr 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matko Marlais
21 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emuella Flood
26 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - James Franciosi
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emuella Flood
27 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - James Franciosi
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - James Franciosi
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
17 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - James Franciosi
Resubmission - Version 6
17 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Nov 2011 Editorially accepted
18 Nov 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-230X-11-126

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement