Open Peer Review Reports for: Bleeding from gastrointestinal angioectasias is not related to bleeding disorders - a case control study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 1 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Meganathan Kannan |
| 8 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Augusto Federici |
| 1 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Charlotte Höög |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 1 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Meganathan Kannan |
| 24 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Charlotte Höög |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 24 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 25 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Charlotte Höög |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 25 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 28 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 28 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-230X-10-113 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
