Skip to main content

Table 2 Area under ROC-curve (95% Confidence intervall) for transient elastography, FibroTest, and ELF according to Metavir/Ludwig's fibrosis stage

From: Comparison of ELF, FibroTest and FibroScan for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis

  Method F ≥ 2
(F2,3,4)
F ≥ 2
adjusted*1
F ≥ 3 F = 4
n = 74 FibroTest 0.69
(0.57 - 0.82)
0.74
(0.62 - 0.87)
0.72
(0.60 - 0.84)
0.91
(0.83 - 0.99)
  ELF 0.78
(0.67 - 0.89)
0.83
(0.72 - 0.94)
0.79
(0.67 - 0.91)
0.92
(0.83 - 1.00)
n = 66 Transient Elastography 0.80
(0.69 - 0.91)
0.85
(0.74 - 0.96)
0.66
(0.51 - 0.82)
0.94
(0.86 - 1.00)
  FibroTest 0.67
(0.54 - 0.80)
0.72
(0.59 - 0.85)
0.63
(0.48 - 0.79)
0.91
(0.82 - 0.99)
  ELF 0.76
(0.64 - 0.88)
0.81
(0.69 - 0.93)
0.69
(0.54 - 0.85)
0.92
(0.83 - 1.00)
  1. *1Dana-adjusted AUROC according to Poynard et al.[17] for a uniform DANA of 2.5