Skip to main content

Table 2 Area under ROC-curve (95% Confidence intervall) for transient elastography, FibroTest, and ELF according to Metavir/Ludwig's fibrosis stage

From: Comparison of ELF, FibroTest and FibroScan for the non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis

 

Method

F ≥ 2

(F2,3,4)

F ≥ 2

adjusted*1

F ≥ 3

F = 4

n = 74

FibroTest

0.69

(0.57 - 0.82)

0.74

(0.62 - 0.87)

0.72

(0.60 - 0.84)

0.91

(0.83 - 0.99)

 

ELF

0.78

(0.67 - 0.89)

0.83

(0.72 - 0.94)

0.79

(0.67 - 0.91)

0.92

(0.83 - 1.00)

n = 66

Transient Elastography

0.80

(0.69 - 0.91)

0.85

(0.74 - 0.96)

0.66

(0.51 - 0.82)

0.94

(0.86 - 1.00)

 

FibroTest

0.67

(0.54 - 0.80)

0.72

(0.59 - 0.85)

0.63

(0.48 - 0.79)

0.91

(0.82 - 0.99)

 

ELF

0.76

(0.64 - 0.88)

0.81

(0.69 - 0.93)

0.69

(0.54 - 0.85)

0.92

(0.83 - 1.00)

  1. *1Dana-adjusted AUROC according to Poynard et al.[17] for a uniform DANA of 2.5