Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Helicobacter pylori prevalence and clinical significance in patients with quiescent Crohn’s disease

  • Adi Lahat1, 2Email author,
  • Uri Kopylov1, 2,
  • Sandra Neuman1, 2,
  • Nina Levhar1, 2,
  • Doron Yablecovitch1, 2,
  • Benjamin Avidan1, 2,
  • Batia Weiss2, 3,
  • Shomron Ben-Horin1, 2,
  • Rami Eliakim1, 2 and
  • on behalf of the Israeli IBD research Network (IIRN)
Contributed equally
BMC GastroenterologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:27

DOI: 10.1186/s12876-017-0588-7

Received: 30 June 2016

Accepted: 10 February 2017

Published: 13 February 2017

Abstract

Background

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is present in about 50% of the global population, and is associated with chronic gastritis, peptic disease and gastric malignancies. HP prevalence in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients was shown to be low compared to the general population, and its influence on disease activity is yet to be determined. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of HP in a selected group of CD patients with quiescent disease, and to assess the influence of its eradication on disease activity and endoscopic and laboratory activity measures.

Methods

Consecutive CD patients with quiescent disease underwent meticulous disease evaluation with MR enterography (MRE), video capsule endoscopy (VCE), CRP, fecal calprotectin and CDAI. All patients were tested for the presence of HP using stool antigen detection kit. Patients infected with HP were offered eradication treatment with sequential therapy. HP eradication was confirmed using urease breath test and stool antigen test. The influence of HP eradication on disease activity was assessed.

Results

Out of 56 patients enrolled, six patients (10.7%) had HP infection. Of them, five patients had gastro- duodenitis per VCE. All HP positive patients were offered eradication treatment and underwent successful eradication. Notably, 23 (50%) of patients had proximal disease per VCE, most of them (78%) were HP negative.

CDAI, CRP, fecal calprotectin and VCE Lewis inflammatory score did not change significantly following HP eradication, Gastric findings on VCE were not impacted by HP eradication.

Conclusions

The prevalence of HP infection in patients with quiescent CD is relatively low. Eradication of the bacteria did not significantly change neither disease activity measures nor the presence of gastro- duodenitis per VCE, suggesting it might be part of proximal CD. The influence of HP on CD activity merits further investigation.

Keywords

Crohn’s disease Helicobacter pylori Video capsule endoscopy Prevalence Eradication

Background

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is one of the most prevailing global pathogens in humans, and can be detected in 50% of the world’s population [1]. Its prevalence varies considerably in association by geography, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic factors.

This Gram- negative bacterium causes chronic inflammation in the gastric mucosa, which leads to atrophic and metaplastic changes. Thus, HP infection is associated with chronic gastritis, peptic disease and gastric malignancies [2, 3]. Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition that can affect the gastrointestinal system from the mouth to the anus. Inflammation is transmural, and therefore may be cause internal abscesses, fistula between adjacent organs, spontaneous viscous perforations and fibrotic strictures.. The disease may cause significant morbidity and diminished life quality [48]. Disease behavior is characterized by periods of flare-ups with active symptomatic disease and periods of remission [9]. Over the years, many epidemiological studies showed low incidence of HP infection in patients with CD [1018].

A recent meta-analysis demonstrated negative association between HP infection and CD with OR of 0.38 (95% CI 0.31 to 0.47, p value <1e-10) [19].

The reason for that negative association is yet to be determined. One hypothesis suggests that medications used for CD treatment may eradicate HP. Another suggestion along the same line is that CD mucosal alterations might prevent HP colonization [14, 15, 1822]. An alternative argument suggests a protective effect for HP infection from the occurrence of CD.

CD is categorized by selectively activation of type 1 T helper lymphocyte (Th1) and Th17-related cytokines involved in innate immunity (interleukin (IL) 12, IL-23, IL-27) [23]. HP was shown to produce IL-18 which causes accumulation of tolerogenic dendritic cells and highly suppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs) that help suppress the inflammatory process [24].

High frequency of gastritis and duodenitis was described in CD patients with no association to HP infection [2022]. However, data assessing the effect of HP infection and eradication on proximal disease and on disease activity in patients with CD is scarce.

Thus, in our study we focused on patients with known quiescent Crohn’s disease that were prospectively evaluated for disease activity measures before and after HP eradication.

Methods

Patient population

Study population consisted of adult (>18 years) CD patients with known small bowel Crohn’s disease in clinical remission, as determined by the validated Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) of <150, or patients suffering from mild disease symptoms, presented by CDAI of 150–220. All patients included were treated with stable medication doses and on corticosteroid-free remission for 3–24 months. Patients maintained on constant treatment throughout study duration.

Patients that were unable to provide informed consent were excluded from the study. Patients with severe comorbidities or with any condition that will prevent them from swallowing VCE (difficulty in swallowing, history of aspirations or dysphagia, known or suspected intestinal obstruction or severe bowel stricturing) or undergoing MRE (claustrophobia or implanted metal objects or cardiac pacemaker) were excluded as well.

Imaging studies

All patients underwent an MRE upon enrollment. MR image acquisition was performed using a previously described protocol [25]. A patency capsule (PC) test was performed in all patients with active small bowel disease detected on MRE. If the PC was not expelled from the small bowel within 30 h, the patient was withdrawn from the study. Mucosal inflammation was quantified using the Lewis inflammatory score (LS). Active inflammation was defined as a segmental Lewis score of ≥135 [26]. A board-certified gastroenterologist with over 10 years of experience in capsule endoscopy read the capsule videos. Gastric and duodenal findings were described for each study.

Inflammatory biomarkers and disease activity measures

Fecal calprotectin, CRP and complete blood count (CBC) were measured routinely every 3 months. Fecal calprotectin levels were measured using the Quantum blue calprotectin kit (BÜHLMANN Laboratories AG, Basel, Switzerland). The reported value range is 30 to 300 μg/g. Levels above 100 μg/g were considered positive. CRP levels were considered elevated if > 5 mg/l.

Patients underwent physician’s evaluation and CDAI assessment for disease activity every 3 months.

HP assessment and treatment

All patients were tested for the presence of HP using stool antigen detection kit as part (CerTest H. pylori one step card test, Certest Biotec S.L. Zaragoza, Spain). Stool antigen test was chosen for HP detection since this method is noninvasive and most importantly is not influenced by antibiotics or Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPI) treatment. This kit has a sensitivity of >94%, pecificity of >99% and Positive predictive value (PPV) of >99% for HP detection. Patients infected with HP were offered eradication treatment with sequential therapy consisted of 5 days of esomeprazole (40 mg) and amoxicillin (1000 mg) twice daily, followed by 5 days of esomeprazole (40 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and Tinidazole (500 mg) twice daily [27]. Notably, sequential therapy is the standard of care for patients infected with HP in our institution. Prior to eradication treatment patients received detailed explanation regarding HP infection implications and the importance of compliance and adherence to treatment. HP eradication was confirmed using urease breath test and stool antigen detection kit 4 weeks following eradication treatment completion.

The impact of HP eradication on disease activity and degree of proximal small bowel inflammation was assessed using the disease activity measures specified above, 8 weeks after eradication conformation.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. Categorical variables were analyzed by Chi Square/Fisher’s exact test and continuous variables-by T-test/Mann Whitney test, as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered significant. All computations were performed with the MedCalc Software (Marieke, Belgium).

Results

Fifty six patients were included in the study. Patients’ demographic data and disease characteristics are shown in Table 1. None of the patients was tested for HP prior to this study. A schematic graph of study design is shown in Fig. 1.
Table 1

Patients’ demographic data and disease characteristics

 

Number

Percent

Male/female

30/26

53.6/46.4

Age at diagnosis (years)

26 ± 11

 

Disease duration (years)

6 ± 5

 

Clinical remission

52

92.3

Smoking status

current

11

19.6

never smoked

36

64.3

past smoking

9

16.1

Previous surgery

9

16.1

Perianal disease

13

23.2

Current medical treatment

Thiopurine

25

44.6

Anti-TNF

21

37.5

Combined anti-TNF + thiopurine

7

12.5

No medical treatment

11

19.6

Fig. 1

Study design

Out of all patients included, only six patients (10.7%) were infected with HP. Of them, five patients had gastro- duodenitis per VCE and one had no proximal disease and no upper GI symptoms. All HP positive patients were offered eradication treatment with sequential therapy detailed above. All infected patients agreed to receive eradication treatment, and all treated patients underwent successful eradication, as was confirmed by a negative urease test and negative stool antigen test. Thus, a 100% eradication rate was achieved.

Notably, 23 (50%) of patients had proximal disease per VCE, most of them (78%) were HP negative.

Four weeks after a verified eradication, a repeated evaluation of disease activity was performed. Physical examination, CBC, CRP was performed and CDAI was calculated. Capsule endoscopy was ingested as well 12 weeks following eradication. Disease activity measures before and 12 weeks following HP eradication in all patients treated was compared, and are shown in Table 2. A separate analysis was performed only for patients who had gastro-duodenitis per VCE before HP eradication. Results are shown in Table 3.
Table 2

Disease activity measures in all HP positive patients before and after eradication (n = 6)

Disease measures

Before eradication

After eradication

p

CDAI

27.5 ± 21.25

22.83 ± 28.25

NS

CRP

1.17 ± 0.82

2.97 ± 4.7

NS

Fecal calprotectin

75 ± 79.37

112.17 ± 123.2

NS

Lewis Score

425 ± 334.29

564.83 ± 529.46

NS

NS non-significant

Table 3

Disease activity measures in HP positive patients with gastroduodenitis on VCE before and after eradication (n = 5)

Disease measures

Before eradication

After eradication

p

CDAI

23.18 ± 25.6

30.91 ± 25.2

NS

CRP

1.218 ± 0.9

5.12 ± 3.398

NS

Fecal calprotectin

85 ± 85.25

74.6 ± 71.57

NS

Lewis Score

357.33 ± 465

587.995 ± 589.8

NS

NS non-significant

As shown in Tables 2 and 3, all disease activity measures as well as anatomical disease distribution (measured by VCE Lewis inflammatory score) were unchanged following HP eradication. Hence, HP eradication had no influence on disease activity.

Figures 2a, b and 3a, b show active CD in the proximal digestive system demonstrated by mucosal erosions in stomach and duodenum - unchanged before and after eradication treatment, respectively.
Fig. 2

Stomach inflammatory changes by VCE. a Gastric erosions (circled) prior to HP eradication. b Gastric erosions (circled) post HP eradication

Fig. 3

Duodenum inflammatory changes by VCE0. a Erosion of proximal duodenum (circled) Prior to HP eradication. b Erosions in proximal duodenum (circled) Post HP eradication

Discussion

HP infection is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide. However, in CD patients its prevalence was shown to be lower than in general population [1018]. The reason for that remains to be determined, as is the mutual impact of CD and HP infection on patients’ symptoms, severity of the disease and on disease distribution. In the current study, we initially assessed the prevalence of HP infection in a homogenous group of CD patients with quiescent disease, and then tried to assess prospectively the impact of HP eradication on disease activity measures and on anatomical inflammatory distribution.

In agreement with data in the literature [1018], HP infection rate was low among our patients’ group, with only 11% of patients tested positive to HP. The current prevalence of HP infection in Israel is unknown, yet data from 2002 [28] suggest a 60% prevalence among the general population in Israel. Thus, even if we assume a possible reduction in HP infection in the general population during the last decade, HP infection among CD patients is still significantly low. Notably, none of our patients was tested for the presence of HP before entering the study, and consequently none was ever treated for HP eradication. Therefore, we believe that our data reflects the true prevalence of HP infection in CD patients.

All the patients who tested positive for HP were offered eradication treatment, though one of them was a-symptomatic. Since HP is a well known carcinogen with a strong proven relation to gastric malignancy [2, 3], we decided to offer eradication treatment to all infected patients.

In order to achieve maximal eradication rates patients were treated with a 10 day sequential therapy, which was shown to have eradication success of up to 94% [29].

In addition, at treatment initiation patients received individual consultation with emphasis on the importance of compliance and adherence to the offered treatment. Eradication was verified both with urease breath test and with stool antigen detection kit. Using this meticulous treatment option, we managed to reach a 100% eradication rate.

Obviously, since our treatment group consisted of 6 patients only, the results are underpowered to assess treatments’ efficacy. However, we believe that the combination of a high- efficacy eradication protocol and highly motivated patients with high compliance rates probably lead to this unusually high eradication rate.

Eradication was verified using breath test and stool antigen kit 4 weeks following treatment completion [30].

Eight weeks following eradication verification, patients underwent repeated disease evaluation, including VCE. Data in literature support repeated endoscopy for peptic disease 4 weeks following HP eradication treatment [31]. Therefore, we postulated that 8 weeks following eradication verification and 12 weeks following end of eradication treatment is appropriate for reevaluation, assuming that all mucosal damage caused by HP would be healed.

Our results show no improvement in proximal disease or in disease measures following HP eradication. Hence, CDAI, CRP and fecal calprotectin levels did not differ significantly after HP eradication, implicating disease activity was unchanged following eradication. Moreover, the VCE Lewis inflammatory score, as a measure of disease activity and distribution was showed no statistically significant improvement following HP eradication as well. These results were unchanged after separate sub analysis of patients with gastro-duodenitis per VCE.

These data implicates that the proximal disease as well as disease activity was unrelated to HP. To the best of our knowledge, up to date, no study addressed disease activity measures pre versus post HP eradication in CD patients.

In our study, 50% of patients had gastro-duodenitis per VCE. These results are in agreement with previous studies that showed an increased prevalence of gastro- duodenitis disease in CD patients with no association to HP infection [2022].

Our study has several limitations. First, our cohort of patients was relatively small. Therefore, due to the low prevalence of HP infection in CD patients, the number of HP infected patients was very low. The small number of patients included might affect the applicability of our results.

Another theoretical drawback of our study is a selection bias- only patients with quiescent disease were included, thus patients with active CD might have had different results.

However, we feel that our data supports the evidence showing high incidence of gastroduodenitis in patients with quiescent CD, unrelated to HP infection.

Conclusions

HP infection in patients with quiescent CD is lower than in the general population, and reaches 11%. Eradication of the bacteria did not change significantly neither disease measures nor the presence of gastro- duodenitis per VCE, suggesting it might be part of proximal CD. The influence of HP on CD activity merits further investigation.

Abbreviations

CBC: 

Complete blood count

CD: 

Crohns’ disease

CDAI: 

Crohn’s disease activity index

HP: 

Helicobacter pylori

IL: 

Interleukin

LS: 

Lewis inflammatory score

MRE: 

MR enterography

PC: 

Patency capsule

PPI: 

Proton pump Inhibitor

Th1: 

Type 1 T helper lymphocyte

VCE: 

Video capsule endoscopy

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The following physicians have collaborated in this research: Iris Dotan, Henit Yanai (Tel Aviv Medical Center); Yehuda Chowers (Rambam Health Campus), Marianne M. Amitai (Chaim Sheba Medical Center).

Funding

The study was partially supported by a generous grant from the Leona M and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust. This generous financial support enabled data collection.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available since it contains identifying patients’ data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contribution

AL – conception and design, data collection, manuscript preparation, revision and drafting. UK- analysis and interpretation of data, manuscript revision. SN – acquisition of data. NL – acquisition of data. DY – acquisition of data. BA – acquisition of data. BW – acquisition of data. SBH – manuscript revising and data interpretation. RE – manuscript revising and data interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests relevant to this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Chaim Sheba Medical Center ethics committee. All patients signed a written informed consent.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer
(2)
Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University
(3)
Edmond and Lily Safra Children’s Hospital

References

  1. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines Helicobacter pylori in developing countries, August 2010. Available at: www.worldgastroenterology.org/UserFiles/file/guidelines/helicobacter-pylori-english-2010.pdf. last Accessed 10 Nov 2015
  2. Sonnenberg A. Review article: historic changes of Helicobacter pylori-associated diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38:329–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Graham DY. History of Helicobacter pylori, duodenal ulcer, gastric ulcer and gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(18):5191–204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Love JR, Irvine EJ, Fedorak RN. Quality of life in IBD. J Clinical Gastroenterol. 1992;14:15–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Casellas F, Arenas JI, Baudet JS, Fábregas S, García N, Gelabert J, et al. Impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a Spanish multicenter study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005;11:488–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rubin GP, Hungin AP, Chinn DJ, Dwarakanath D. Quality of life in patients with established inflammatory bowel disease: a UK general practice survey. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:529–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Casellas F, López-Vivancos J, Badia X, Vilaseca J, Malagelada JR. Influence of inflammatory bowel disease on different dimensions of quality of life. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;13:567–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Canavan C, Abrams KR, Hawthorne B, Drossman D, Mayberry JF. Long-term prognosis in Crohn’s disease: factors that affect quality of life. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:377–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Latella G, Papi C. Crucial steps in the natural history of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3790–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Sonnenberg A, Genta RM. Low prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:469–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Xiang Z, Chen YP, Ye YF, Ma KF, Chen SH, Zheng L, et al. Helicobacter pylori and Crohn’s disease: a retrospective single-center study from China. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:4576–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Pearce CB, Duncan HD, Timmis L, Green JR. Assessment of the prevalence of infection with Helicobacter pylori in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;12:439–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. El-Omar E, Penman I, Cruikshank G, Dover S, Banerjee S, Williams C, et al. Low prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in inflammatory bowel disease: association with sulphasalazine. Gut. 1994;35:1385–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. D’Incà R, Sturniolo G, Cassaro M, di Pace C, Longo G, Callegari I, et al. Prevalence of upper gastrointestinal lesions and Helicobacter pylori infection in Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:988–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Parente F, Molteni P, Bollani S, Maconi G, Vago L, Duca PG, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and related upper gastrointestinal lesions in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. A cross-sectional study with matching. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32:1140–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Piodi LP, Bardella M, Rocchia C, Cesana BM, Baldassarri A, Quatrini M. Possible protective effect of 5-aminosalicylic acid on Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36:22–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pellicano R, Bresso F, Demarchi B, Bertolusso L, Sapone N, Rizzetto M, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: pilot study. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2010;102:675–66. author reply 676.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Triantafillidis JK, Gikas A, Apostolidiss N, Merikas E, Mallass E, Peros G. The low prevalence of helicobacter infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease could be attributed to previous antibiotic treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1213–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Castaño-Rodríguez N, Kaakoush NO, Lee WS, Mitchell HM. Dual role of Helicobacter and Campylobacter species in IBD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2015 Oct 27. pii: gutjnl-2015-310545. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310545. [Epub ahead of print]
  20. Roka K, Roma E, Stefanaki K, Panayotou I, Kopsidas G, Chouliaras G. The value of focally enhanced gastritis in the diagnosis of pediatric inflammatory bowel diseases. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:797–802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sonnenberg A, Melton SD, Genta RM. Frequent occurrence of gastritis and duodenitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011;17:39–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Halme L, Kärkkäinen P, Rautelin H, Kosunen TU, Sipponen P. High frequency of helicobacter negative gastritis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gut. 1996;38:379–83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sartor RB. Mechanisms of disease: pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;3:390–407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Arnold IC, Hitzler I, Muller A. The immunomodulatory properties of Helicobacter pylori confer protection against allergic and chronic inflammatory disorders. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2012;2:10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Shrot S, Konen E, Hertz M, Amitai MM. Magnetic resonance enterography: 4 years experience in a tertiary medical center. Isr Med Assoc J. 2011;13(3):172–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Annese V, Daperno M, Rutter MD, Amiot A, Bossuyt P, East J, Ferrante M, Götz M, Katsanos KH, Kießlich R, et al. European evidence based consensus for endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2013;7:982–1018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Feng L, Wen MY, Zhu YJ, Men RT, Yang L. Sequential Therapy or Standard Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection: An Updated Systematic Review. Am J Ther. 2016 May-Jun;23(3):e880–93.Google Scholar
  28. Samra Z, Shmuely H, Niv Y, Dinari G, Passaro DJ, Geler A, et al. Resistance of Helicobacter pylori isolated in Israel to metronidazole, clarithromycin, tetracycline, amoxicillin and cefixime. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49:1023–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tepeš B, Vujasinović M, Šeruga M, Stefanovič M, Forte A, Jeverica S. Randomized clinical trial comparing 10-day sequential, 7-day concomitant and 7-day standard triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28:676–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim JS, Kim BW, Hong SJ, Kim JI, Shim KN, Kim JH, et al. Sequential Therapy versus Triple Therapy for the First Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori in Korea: A Nationwide Randomized Trial.Gut Liver. 2016 Apr 28. doi: 10.5009/gnl15470. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  31. Lai KC, Hui WM, Wong BC, Hu WH, Lam SK. Ulcer-healing drugs are required after eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with gastric ulcer but not duodenal ulcer haemorrhage. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14:1071–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017