What are the risk factors of colonoscopic perforation?
© Lohsiriwat et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 18 March 2009
Accepted: 24 September 2009
Published: 24 September 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Mar 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 May 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Varut Lohsiriwat|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 May 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Teoh|
|21 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gregorios Paspatis|
|23 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Farley|
|1 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Varut Lohsiriwat|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|1 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anthony Teoh|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|23 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Varut Lohsiriwat|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|23 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|24 Sep 2009||Editorially accepted|
|24 Sep 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-230X-9-71|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.