The EQ-5D (Euroqol) is a valid generic instrument for measuring quality of life in patients with dyspepsia
© Mahadeva et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 18 December 2008
Accepted: 12 March 2009
Published: 12 March 2009
There is little information of the validity of generic instruments in measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with dyspepsia. We aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the EQ-5D, a brief and simple instrument, in measuring HRQOL in adult patients with dyspepsia.
Consecutive adults with dyspepsia attending the Gastroenterology clinic in a tertiary referral center were interviewed with the EQ-5D (both English and Malay versions), the short-form Nepean Dyspepsia Index (SF-NDI), the SF-36 and Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (LDQ). Known-groups and convergent construct validity were investigated by testing hypotheses at attribute and overall levels. A repeat telephone interview was conducted 2 weeks later to assess test-retest reliability.
A total of 113 patients (mean (SD) age: 53.7 (14) years; 49.5% male; 24.8% Malays, 37.2% Chinese; 70.8% functional dyspepsia) were recruited. Response rate was 100% with nil missing data. Known-groups validation revealed 20/26 hypotheses fulfillment. Patients with more severe dyspepsia reported more problems with their usual activity (p = 0.07) and pain (p = 0.06) and demonstrated lower median VAS scores (60 vs 70, p = 0.002) and EQ-5D utility scores (0.72 vs 0.78, p = 0.002). Those reporting problems in various EQ-5D dimensions had significantly lower scores in relevant SF-36 and SF-NDI dimensions. The overall EQ-5D utility score also demonstrated good correlation with the SF-36 summary physical and mental scores and the SF-NDI total score. Intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.55 – 0.76).
The EQ-5D is an acceptable, valid and reliable generic instrument for measuring HRQOL in adult patients with dyspepsia.
Dyspepsia, a collection of upper gastrointestinal symptoms due to various causes, is a common problem worldwide . As most patients with dyspepsia have functional disease, the treatment of which remains unsatisfactory at present , health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurement has become an important clinical objective in the assessment of new therapies for this condition . Several disease-specific HRQOL instruments for dyspepsia have been developed including the quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire  and the Nepean Dyspepsia Index , both of which are valid and reliable tools for assessing HRQOL in patients with dyspepsia. These instruments are more responsive to change in HRQOL in dyspeptic patients, especially following therapy, and hence ideal for evaluating newer medical therapies, etc.
However, disease-specific instruments for dyspepsia do not allow for comparisons with patients with illnesses other than dyspepsia and with healthy individuals in the general population. Generic HRQOL instruments are therefore valuable to supplement disease-specific instruments to enable such comparisons. The Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) is one of the most widely accepted generic instruments for measuring HRQOL in many countries . However, it is relatively long and may not be appropriate for large population surveys involving direct interview techniques. The EQ-5D is another generic HRQOL instrument that has been shown to be valid and reliable in the general population and various patient groups [7–9]. It is brief, comprising of five questions and a visual analogue scale, which makes it easy to use and particularly attractive in large scale population surveys, for surveys in the elderly and those with lower educational levels. It has the additional advantage of allowing incorporation of HRQOL data into pharmacoeconomic analyses.
To compare HRQOL of dyspeptic patients with those of the general population, the generic instrument has to be shown to be valid and reliable in dyspepsia first. To our knowledge, the EQ-5D has not been validated for this purpose before and we therefore aimed to examine this in a group of Malaysian patients with dyspepsia attending regular follow up at a tertiary institution.
Ethical approval was obtained by the University Malaya Medical Centre Ethics Committee prior to the commencement of this study. Consecutive adult outpatients with dyspepsia attending the Gastroenterology clinic of this tertiary teaching institution were invited to participate in the study. Most of these patients had functional or non-ulcer dyspepsia (defined as dyspepsia with a normal or minor endoscopic findings), with the remaining attending follow up for organic disease (endoscopic findings of duodenal erosions, peptic ulcer disease and erosive oesophagitis). Patients were interviewed by a trained research assistant using HRQOL and disease severity instruments validated for use in Malaysia (see below) in English or Malay (depending on individual patient's language proficiency). Additional information obtained included period of medical consultation and socio-economic-demographic status. Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D was evaluated by administering the EQ-5D twice to the same subjects, 2-weeks apart, and comparing the scores obtained on these two occasions. The second interview was conducted over the telephone by our trained research assistant.
The EQ-5D comprises five questions on mobility, self-care, pain, usual activities and psychological status with three possible answers for each item (1 = no problems, 2 = moderate problems, 3 = severe problems) . An overall utility score is calculated based on these domains, with a range score from 0 (worse health scenario) to a maximum of 1.0 (best health scenario). An additional visual analogue scale (VAS, scale 0 – 100) is used to assess general health status with 100 indicating the best health status. Malaysian English and Malaysian Malay versions of the EQ-5D were developed by the EuroQoL Group: 2005 (original developers) using their standard translation and linguistic validation process  and have been validated for use in Malaysia.
The SF-36 is an established generic HRQOL instrument which comprises 36 questions and eight different sub-scores: physical functioning, physical role limitations, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations, mental health and 2 composite scores – Physical Component (PCS) and Mental Component Scores (MCS) scored on a 0 to 100 scale . The maximum score of 100 indicates the best possible health state. English and Malay versions have previously been validated in Malaysia and shown to be a reliable measure of general QOL health status .
The Short Form (SF) Nepean Dyspepsia Index is a disease-specific HRQOL instrument for dyspepsia, comprising a 10-item questionnaire examining the influence of dyspepsia on five elements (sub-scales) of health in patients, namely tension/anxiety, interference with daily activities, disruption to regular eating/drinking, knowledge towards/control over disease symptoms and interference with work/study . Each item is measured by a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all or not applicable), 1 (a little), 2 (moderately), 3 (quite a lot) to 4 (extremely). Individual items are subsequently computed to obtain a score range from 0 (lowest HRQOL score) to 100 (highest HRQOL score) as per the developers' original calculation formula . A total, overall SF-NDI score is obtained by the summation of all sub-scale scores followed by division of five. This instrument has previously been shown to be valid, sensitive and reliable for measuring HRQOL status in Malaysian patients with dyspepsia 
The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (LDQ), is an eight item symptom-based questionnaire relating to the frequency and severity of various upper G.I. symptoms, namely upper abdominal pain/discomfort, heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, belching, nausea, vomiting and post-prandial distension/early satiety . The total score ranges from 0 – 40, with lower values indicating less severity and higher values more severe dyspepsia. A score of 15 or more had been defined by the developers as indicative of severe dyspepsia. The questionnaire has previously been validated in our local population and shown to be reliable in assessing dyspepsia amongst Malaysians .
Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D were evaluated by assessing its frequency of missing data, ceiling and floor effects (i.e. percentage of samples achieving highest and lowest values), test-retest reliability and construct validity. The reliability of an instrument refers to its ability to yield reproducible and consistent results. Construct validity is an assessment of the degree to which an instrument measures the construct that it was designed to measure. The process involves forming hypothetical models to describe the constructs being assessed and postulating their relationship. An assessment of the relationship between the construct data is then made to confirm or refute prior expectations and hence determine the validity of the instrument being tested .
Construct validity of the EQ-5D was assessed by testing 26 a-priori hypotheses related to item or utility scores as follows: a) patients with less favourable demography in relation to dyspepsia would report more problems with relevant EQ-5D dimensions, b) patients with more severe dyspeptic symptoms would have more problems with relevant EQ-5D dimensions and lower utility scores c) subjects reporting problems for any EQ-5D dimensions would have lower scores for relevant SF-36 and SF-NDI scales and d) utility scores for EQ-5D would correlate well with SF-36 and SF-NDI summary scores. Test-retest reliability of EQ-5D was evaluated by administering the EQ-5D twice to the same subjects, 2-weeks apart, and comparing the scores obtained on these two occasions. The first interview was conducted face-to-face and the second interview was conducted over the telephone, both by our trained research assistant.
Hypothesized trends were tested using Chi-square or Mann-Whitney tests, or Spearmans' correlation coefficient where appropriate. Strong, moderate and weak correlations were defined as > 0.60, 0.30 – 0.60 and < 0.30 respectively . Test-retest reliability of the EQ-5D utility score was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients, with a desired value of > 0.6 . Statistical significance for hypothesis fulfillment was defined as a p value of < 0.05. Data were analysed with SPSS for windows (version 12, SPSS Inc, IL, USA).
Characteristics and demography of Malaysian patients with dyspepsia in the study
n = 113
Mean age (range)
53.7 ± 14 (17 – 83)
Gender (Male: Female)
Primary (6 years of education)
Secondary (12 years of education
Tertiary (at least 15 years of education)
Peptic ulcer disease
Gastroesophageal reflux disease
Length of dyspeptic symptoms (years)
(median; interquartile range)
7.5 (3 – 20)
Period of medical consultation (years)
(median; interquartile range)
6 (3 – 18)
LDQ score (median; interquartile range)
16 (11 – 22)
Ninety four (83.2%) patients participated in the follow-up telephone interview, which was conducted at a median of 16 days (range 13 – 18) after the original interview. Intraclass correlation coefficient for the EQ-5D utility score was 0.66 (95% CI = 0.55 – 0.76, p < 0.0001).
Relationship of EQ-5D dimensions, utility scores and VAS to other relevant variables
EQ-5D dimension/utility score vs variable
Usual activity vs severe dyspepsia #
Pain vs severe dyspepsia #
Utility score vs dyspepsia#
VAS scale vs dyspepsia
The brevity and simplicity of the EQ-5D makes it particularly attractive for use in large scale population surveys of dyspepsia. Furthermore, a single utility score summarizing all 5 dimension states in health can be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for cost-utility analysis of interventions in dyspepsia, where most patients have functional disease with variable outcomes. However, before the EQ-5D can be utilized for dyspepsia in this manner, it has to demonstrate satisfactory psychometric properties in this condition. In this study of patients with dyspepsia from a variety of causes, from different ethnic backgrounds, of varying ages (from 17 – 83 years) and with > 90% secondary education, the EQ-5D was found to be reliable and to have acceptable construct validity, suggesting that it could be a useful generic HRQOL measure for patients with dyspepsia.
Reliability assessment of a HRQOL instrument consists of determining that a measurement yields consistent and reproducible results . We used the test-retest reliability method in our population of stable dyspeptics and demonstrated moderate to good reliability of the EQ-5D in dyspeptics. Possible discrepancy with the follow-up interview technique, as this was telephone based compared to a face-to-face method at baseline may have resulted in a lower intraclass correlation coefficient value. It was unlikely that any major change in dyspeptic symptoms could have occurred in the interval of (median) 2 weeks between interviews as most patients had a prolonged duration of symptoms (median 7.5 years, range 3 – 20 years) and were on regular anti-dyspeptic therapy.
The validity of the EQ-5D was demonstrated by the fulfillment of twenty of the 26 hypotheses based on known-groups construct validity. Hypothesized relationships for the remaining six hypotheses were present, but failed to reach statistical significance. For dyspepsia in particular, the total utility score and the dimension of "pain" were able to demonstrate poorer HRQOL outcomes in patients with more severe symptoms. As the EQ-5D derives information for each dimension of HRQOL from only one item, it is important that we demonstrate this to be sufficient by comparing it against a more detailed and established multi-dimension instrument. In this study, we demonstrated that patients reporting problems in all five dimensions of the EQ-5D had significantly lower scores in relevant dimensions of the SF-36. Furthermore, the overall EQ-5D utility score showed good correlation with the SF-36 physical and mental summary scores, further substantiating the validity of the EQ-5D.
A possible limitation of many generic HRQOL instruments are that dimensions of health being measured tend to be more physical or mobility-based. In this context, published literature on the validity of the EQ-5D in specific diseases have mainly been shown for physically limiting illnesses such as Parkinson's disease , rheumatological conditions  and stroke . In this study, we compared EQ-5D dimensions to a dyspepsia-specific HRQOL instrument, the SF-NDI, and found that physical dimensions dealing with "mobility" and "self-care" had poor (i.e. non-significant or non-hypothesized trend) associations and were not relevant to dyspepsia-related HRQOL. This is not surprising at all as dyspepsia rarely, if ever, causes problems with mobility and inability to self-care. However, dyspepsia is known to be associated with psychological disorders and can result in work-absenteeism . Accordingly, we demonstrated that patients reporting problems in dimensions of the EQ-5D relating to "usual activities" and "anxiety/depression" had significantly lower scores in relevant SF-NDI sub-scales. Additionally, those reporting problems with "pain/discomfort" had lower scores with most SF-NDI sub-scales (abdominal pain or discomfort being a predominant symptom in dyspepsia) and the utility score correlated well with the SF-NDI summary score.
A limitation of this cross-sectional study was the inability to assess other properties of the EQ-5D in relation to dyspepsia, such as its' responsiveness. The latter requires a cohort study to examine the ability of an instrument to detect change in HRQOL status.
We are able to conclude that the EQ-5D is an acceptable, valid and reliable generic instrument for measuring health-related HRQOL in adult patients with dyspepsia. Our data are consistent with other studies exploring the validity of the EQ-5D in various disease states [8, 9, 19], although most of these have been either neurological or rheumatological conditions. We believe that the EQ-5D may be useful in measuring health-related HRQOL in other gastroenterological diseases, although further validation studies will have to be conducted to determine this.
The authors wish to thank the EuroQol group for permitting the use of the EQ-5D instrument for this study and for providing the locally validated language versions of the instrument.
- El-Serag HB, Talley NJ: Systemic review: the prevalence and clinical course of functional dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004, 19 (6): 643-654. 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01897.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drossman DA, Corazziari E, Talley NJ, Thompson WG, Whitehead WE: ROME II The functional gastrointestinal disorders. 2000, Lawrence, Kansas, USA: Allen Press Inc, 2Google Scholar
- Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ, Cleary C, Talley NJ, Peterson TC, Nyren O, Bradley LA, Verlinden M, Tytgat GN: Drug treatment of functional dyspepsia: a systematic analysis of trial methodology with recommendations for design of future trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996, 91 (4): 660-673.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiklund IK, Junghard O, Grace E, Talley NJ, Kamm M, Veldhuyzen van Zanten S, Pare P, Chiba N, Leddin DS, Bigard MA, et al: Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia patients. Psychometric documentation of a new disease-specific questionnaire (QOLRAD). Eur J Surg Suppl. 1998, 41-49. 583
- Talley NJ, Verlinden M, Jones M: Validity of a new quality of life scale for functional dyspepsia: a United States multicenter trial of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999, 94 (9): 2390-2397. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.01363.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE: The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993, 31 (3): 247-263. 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brooks R: EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996, 37 (1): 53-72. 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schrag A, Selai C, Jahanshahi M, Quinn NP: The EQ-5D – a generic quality of life measure-is a useful instrument to measure quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000, 69 (1): 67-73. 10.1136/jnnp.69.1.67.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, Koh DR, Ng SC, Yoon KH, Vasoo S, Li SC, Thumboo J: Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in English-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Qual Life Res. 2003, 12 (1): 87-92. 10.1023/A:1022063721237.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Rabin R, Badia X, Selai C: Producing other language versions of the EQ-5D. The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: A European perspective. Edited by: Brooks RRR, de Charro F. 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, chp 11: 183-189.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ware JE, Kristin KS, Kosinski M: SF-36 Health Survey Manual and interpretation guide. 1993, Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical CenterGoogle Scholar
- Sararaks S, Azman AB, Low LL, Rugayah B, Aziah AM, Hooi LN, Abdul Razak M, Norhaya MR, Lim KB, Azian AA, et al: Validity and reliability of the SF-36: the Malaysian context. Med J Malaysia. 2005, 60 (2): 163-179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Talley NJ, Verlinden M, Jones M: Quality of life in functional dyspepsia: responsiveness of the Nepean Dyspepsia Index and development of a new 10-item short form. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001, 15 (2): 207-216. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2001.00900.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mahadeva S, Wee HL, Goh KL, Thumboo J: Quality of life in South East Asian patients who consult for dyspepsia: validation of the short form Nepean Dyspepsia Index. Med J Malaysia. 2008, 63 (Suppl B): 31-Google Scholar
- Moayyedi P, Duffett S, Braunholtz D, Mason S, Richards ID, Dowell AC, Axon AT: The Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire: a valid tool for measuring the presence and severity of dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998, 12 (12): 1257-1262. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1998.00404.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menon SK, Cheng JLS, Liew FY, Menon J, Ganesalingam K, Singh H: Adaptation and validation of the Leeds Dyspepsia Questionnaire (LDQ) to a Malaysian setting. Med J Malaysia. 2001, 56 (A): 54-Google Scholar
- Fayers PM, Machin D: Quality of life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. 2000, Chichester: John Wiley & SonsView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hinkle DE, Jurs SG, Wiersma W: Applied statistics for the behavioural sciences. 1988, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, xix: 2Google Scholar
- Dorman PJ, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P: Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke?. Stroke. 1997, 28 (10): 1876-1882.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moayyedi P, Mason J: Clinical and economic consequences of dyspepsia in the community. Gut. 2002, 50 (Suppl 4): iv10-12. 10.1136/gut.50.suppl_4.iv10.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/9/20/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.