Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Oxytocin and cholecystokinin secretion in women with colectomy

BMC Gastroenterology20044:25

DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-4-25

Received: 22 April 2004

Accepted: 07 October 2004

Published: 07 October 2004

Abstract

Background

Cholecystokinin (CCK) concentrations in plasma have been shown to be significantly higher in colectomised subjects compared to healthy controls. This has been ascribed to reduced inhibition of CCK release from colon. In an earlier study CCK in all but one woman who was colectomised, induced release of oxytocin, a peptide present throughout the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The aim of this study was thus to examine if colectomised women had a different oxytocin response to CCK compared to healthy controls.

Methods

Eleven women, mean age 34.4 ± 2.3 years, who had undergone colectomy because of ulcerative colitis or constipation were studied. Eleven age-matched healthy women served as controls. All subjects were fasted overnight and given 0.2 μg/kg body weight of CCK-8 i.v. in the morning. Samples were taken ten minutes and immediately before the injection, and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min afterwards. Plasma was collected for measurement of CCK and oxytocin concentrations.

Results

The basal oxytocin and CCK concentrations in plasma were similar in the two groups. Intravenous injection of CCK increased the release of oxytocin from 1.31 ± 0.12 and 1.64 ± 0.19 pmol/l to 2.82 ± 0.35 and 3.26 ± 0.50 pmol/l in controls and colectomised women, respectively (p < 0.001). Given the short half-life of CCK-8 in plasma, the increased concentration following injection could not be demonstrated in the controls. On the other hand, in colectomised women, an increase of CCK in plasma was observed for up to 20 minutes after the injection, concentrations increasing from 1.00 ± 0.21 to a maximum of 1.81 ± 0.26 pmol/l (p < 0.002).

Conclusion

CCK stimulates the release of oxytocin in women. There is no difference in plasma concentrations between colectomised and controls. However, colectomy seems to reduce the metabolic clearance of CCK. The hyperCCKemia in patients who had undergone colectomy is consequently not only dependent on CCK release, but may also depend on reduced clearance.

Background

The gut hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) is synthesised in endocrine I cells in the mucosa of the upper small intestine [1] and is released into the blood after ingestion of fatty and protein-rich meals [2]. CCK has various effects on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and acts on afferent vagal nerves [3], neurons of the myenteric plexus [4], and directly on muscle cells [5]. It is also synthesised in central neurons including hypothalamic, oxytocinergic neurons [6]. Circulating CCK is degraded in several sites, namely the kidney, liver and gut [7, 8].

Oxytocin is synthesised in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus as part of a larger precursor polypeptide [9]. While the main effects are in the myoepithelial cells and uterine smooth muscle in the responses associated with the milk ejection reflex and parturition, the possibility has been raised that oxytocin also contributes to control of the GI motility [10, 11]. Both exogenous and food-stimulated endogenous CCK stimulates the pituitary secretion of oxytocin in the rat through CCK-receptors on afferent vagal neurons [12]. In hypothalamus, both parvocellular neurons projecting to the dorsal vagal complex, and magnocellular neurons projecting to the pituitary, secrete oxytocin in response to CCK [13].

We have recently found that CCK also leads to oxytocin release in healthy women [14]. However, one of the women included was colectomised, and she was the only one who had no release of oxytocin in response to CCK [14], although colectomy leads to higher concentrations of CCK in plasma [1517]. We have found mRNA for oxytocin and its receptor throughout the GI tract [18], as well as the fully expressed proteins (unpublished observation). We do not know if this has an autocrine and/or paracrine role in the gut, or if it also is released into the blood as a hormone. The aim of this study was therefore to examine if women who had performed a colectomy, had a different oxytocin response to CCK than otherwise healthy women with an intact GI tract.

Methods

Subjects

Eleven women from the Departments of Medicine and Surgery at Malmö University Hospital (mean age 34.4 ± 2.3 years, range 22–42 years) were studied. They had all a history of colectomy. Two were colectomised because of slow transit constipation (STC) and had undergone a subtotal colectomy with the creation of ileo-rectal anastomosis. Proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis had been performed in seven of them because of ulcerative colitis, and one because of familial multiple polyposis. The last patient has an ileostomy after subtotal colectomy, saving the rectum, because of ulcerative colitis. Thus, the subjects were cured from their original conditions. The time interval between the proctocolectomy/colectomy and this study was 10–149 months, with a mean of 48.5 ± 12.6 months. Eleven age-matched healthy women with preserved GI tract served as controls. Physical examination and laboratory routine screening were all within normal limits in both groups. The body weight was 68.7 ± 5.8 kg in the patients and 73.8 ± 6.1 kg in the controls. No drugs and no oral contraceptives or other hormonal treatments were allowed in either group. The experiments were performed at no specific stage of the menstrual cycle. None of the included subjects had participated in our former study [14].

Protocols

The protocols were approved by the local Ethics committee at the University of Lund, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study was started. The possibility of pregnancy was excluded in all women.

Experimental procedure

All subjects were fasted overnight. In the morning they were given 0.2 μg/kg body weight of cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) (Clinalfa, Switzerland) as an intravenous injection. This bolus was chosen as it was the only dose giving raise to a weak, but not significant, oxytocin release in an earlier study [19]. Blood samples were taken through an intravenous catheter 10 min before and immediately before the injection, and 10, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after the injection.

Hormone analysis

All blood samples consisted of 8.0 ml whole blood drawn into iced heparinised tubes. The plasma was separated and frozen at -20°C immediately after the experiment. Oxytocin was measured as described by Balment et al [20] using the Fourth International Standard for oxytocin (76/575). The lower limit of detection for this assay was 0.1 pmol/l with intra-assay and interassay variations of 5.4 and 11.8 %, respectively, at 2.5 pmol/l. The hormone was extracted from plasma using C 18 Sep Pak Columns (Waters Associates Ltd., Northwick, Middx., U.K.). The concentrations of CCK in plasma were measured using a highly specific and accurate radioimmunoassay as previously described [21]. The limit of detection for his assay is 0.1 pmol/l with intra-assay and interassay variations of less than 5 % and 15 %, respectively, at both 3.7 and 15 pmol/l concentrations.

Statistical analysis

The values are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The basal value is the mean of the two fasting values. The peak value is the mean of the highest concentration in every subject after the injection. The total plasma CCK and oxytocin response was assessed by calculating the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC). The Kruskal-Wallis followed by Wilcoxon signed ranks test were used for assessment of the significance of the differences within and between the two groups. The Spearman rank test was used for calculating the correlation between CCK and oxytocin concentrations in plasma. Probabilities of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Plasma oxytocin concentrations

The basal oxytocin concentration in plasma was similar in the two groups. The concentration was stable before the start of the experiments. Injection of CCK-8 led to an increase of the oxytocin secretion compared to basal values in both groups (p < 0.001) (Table 1). The increase in plasma concentration of oxytocin was observed after 10 min and persisted throughout the study. The highest concentration was found after 20 min (Fig 1). There was no difference of the AUC between the two groups, neither there was any difference between each time point studied (Fig 1).
Table 1

Basal and peak plasma values of cholecystokinin (CCK) and oxytocin

 

CCK (pmol/l) N = 11

Oxytocin (pmol/l) N = 11

Controls

  

Basal

0.7 ± 0.1

1.3 ± 0.1

Peak

0.9 ± 0.1

2.8 ± 0.4***

Patients

  

Basal

1.0 ± 0.2

1.6 ± 0.2

Peak

1.8 ± 0.3**+

3.3 ± 0.5***

Values are expressed as mean value ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Comparisons are made within groups; ** = p < 0.01, *** = p < 0.001, and between groups; + = p < 0.05. Wilcoxon signed rank test. The basal value is the mean of the two fasting values. The peak value is the mean of the highest concentration in every subject after the injection.

Figure 1

The plasma concentration of oxytocin before and at different time points after an injection of 0.2 μg/kg body weight of cholecystokinin-8 (CCK-8). There were 11 subjects in each group. Values are given as mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). There was no difference between the groups neither when calculating values at different time points studied nor the area under the curve (AUC). Wilcoxon signed rank test. = control, = patient.

Plasma cholecystokinin concentrations

There was a tendency towards higher basal CCK concentration in patients, although not significant (Table 1 and Fig 2). CCK-8 has a half-life in plasma of about < 1 min (8). Therefore, no increase in plasma CCK could be detected in the control group after the intravenous injection of CCK-8 (Table 1). However, in colectomised women, an increase in plasma CCK concentrations was found after the injection compared to basal values (p < 0.002). The difference of peak value between the groups was significant (p < 0.04) (Table 1). The AUC differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.04), but no difference was observed between values at each time point studied (Fig 2).
Figure 2

The plasma concentration of cholecystokinin (CCK) before and at different time points after an injection of 0.2 μg/kg body weight of CCK-8. There were 11 subjects in each group. Values are given as mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). When calculating the area under the curve (AUC), there was a significantly increased AUC in the colectomised subjects compared to controls (p < 0.04). No difference was seen between the groups when comparing values at each time point. Wilcoxon signed rank test. = control, = patient.

There was no correlation between CCK and oxytocin concentrations (data not shown). Neither was there any difference in CCK and oxytocin concentrations between patients with different diagnosis and those who had rectum saved or resected (data not shown).

Discussion

This study shows for the first time that CCK-8 increases the secretion of oxytocin in women. We have previously shown that exogenous CCK-33 and -39, and a fatty meal with endogenous CCK release, led to enhanced concentrations of oxytocin in plasma [14]. One patient in that study was colectomised, and she was the only one in whom no increase in oxytocin release was seen after CCK stimulation. This observation prompted the present study. In this study, there was no difference in plasma concentrations of oxytocin between colectomised and healthy controls. Thus, the oxytocin secreted into the blood after CCK stimulation seems not to origin from the colon. The oxytocin recently found in the colon may participate in autocrine and/or paracrine regulation of the gut while having no endocrine effects [18]. The patient group examined in this study was not homogenous, but it was not possible to include enough young women with colectomy after ulcerative colitis. We have earlier described the presence of oxytocin and its receptor throughout the gut, without any efforts to quantify the expression [18]. Only the effect of colon on plasma concentrations of oxytocin was measured in the present study. We do not know from this study if oxytocin from some other part of the gut is released into the plasma. It is difficult to conduct an experiment to examine the origin from the oxytocin release. CCK acts on receptors on afferent vagal nerves to stimulate the oxytocin release from the pituarity [12], and these receptors are present throughout the GI tract [35]. Therefore it is not possible to use CCK-receptor antagonists to distinguish between central or local CCK effects.

CCK has been shown to stimulate oxytocin secretion in mammals in many studies [1214]. However, in a previous study, intravenous injection of CCK-8, in the same dose as in our study, did not increase the concentration of oxytocin in plasma [19]. This may depend on methodological differences. Another possible explanation to the difference is the effect of gonadal hormones on the regulation of the oxytocin release from the posterior pituitary gland. In our study, only women were included, whereas Miaskiewicz et al [19] examined 13 men and one woman. Orally administered estrogen stimulates oxytocin secretion, and progesterone also affects release [22]. Lower plasma levels of these hormones in men may explain the absence of increased oxytocin secretion in men. In addition, one study has shown that testosterone inhibits the secretion of oxytocin from the pituitary gland [23].

Oxytocin is present in plasma in men, although at lower concentrations [24, 25], and shows a circadian rythm [26]. Oxytocin may have similar effects on the GI tract in men and women, although the plasma concentrations differ. The effects of oxytocin have been only rudimentary examined. However, oxytocin has in one study been shown to enhance gastric emptying [10], and in a yet unpublished study, we have found that an oxytocin-receptor antagonist delayed the gastric emptying rate (unpublished observation). Further, we have demonstrated increased colonic peristaltis after oxytocin stimulation in healthy women [11]. Our finding of oxytocin release in response to a meal [14], and the presence of oxytocin receptors on the cells that regulate the gut motility (unpublished observation), suggest oxytocin to play a physiological role in the GI function.

Several studies have reported that after colectomy in different species there are higher concentrations of CCK in plasma, both basal and postprandial, compared to healthy controls [1517]. It has been suggested that this is due to depletion of an inhibitory factor of CCK secretion which is released from the colon. Peptide YY (PYY) is secreted from distal ileum and colon, and CCK is known to stimulate PYY secretion from the hindgut [2729]. PYY then inhibits further CCK secretion [30, 31]. As PYY is secreted from the hindgut, this peptide is substantially reduced after colectomy [26]. Thus, the reduced PYY concentration may explain the hyperCCKemia. In this study, the elevated CCK concentrations in the group of colectomised women were not due to increased secretion of CCK, as CCK was injected exogenously. Instead, the hyperCCKemia in the group of colectomised patients seems to be due to reduced degradation of the peptide injected. CCK is degraded in the kidney, liver and gut [7, 8]. Our hypothesis is that PYY could contribute to the degradation as well as the secretion of CCK. Receptors for PYY have been found in the kidney and on hepatocytes, and PYY influences the renal and hepatocyte metabolism [3234]. Alternatively, the different CCK concentrations could be due to reduced degradation in the colon in addition to the kidney and liver, as CCK-8 has been shown to be degraded in the gut in pigs [8]. It remains to be determined which mechanism contributes most to the hyperCCKemia observed after colectomy; increased CCK secretion, or decreased clearance. In the present study, the basal levels of CCK did not differ significantly in colectomised, as observed in earlier studies [1517].

CCK has a wide range of effects on the GI tract. Three physiological effects on gut motility have been identified; contraction of the gallbladder [2], relaxation of the sphincter Oddi [35] and inhibition of gastric emptying [2]. Its role on colonic motility is controversial. While Barone et al [36] were able to demonstrate contractions, Niederau et al could find no effect of CCK [37]. Further, CCK increases pancreatic enzyme secretion [2]. It is not known if the hyperCCKemia observed in colectomised patients [1517] has any impact on GI motility or health.

Conclusions

CCK stimulates the release of oxytocin in women, probably via an effect on the neurohypophysial system. There is no difference in plasma concentrations between colectomised women and women with intact GI tract. The hyperCCKemia observed in patients who have undergone colectomy is dependent not only on an increase in CCK release, but may also depend on a reduced degradation. It was beyond the aim of our study to determine the clearance of CCK. However, this should be evaluated further.

Abbreviations

AUC: 

area under the curve

CCK: 

cholecystokinin

GI: 

gastrointestinal

PYY: 

peptide YY

SEM: 

standard error of the mean

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Mariette Bengtsson for technical assistance, Kirsten Dahl and Mikael Truedsson for recruiting subjects, and Jan-Åke Nilsson for expert statistical calculations. This study was supported by grants from Nio Meter Liv, Ruth and Richard Juhlin and Åke Wiberg. The Development Foundation of Region Skåne and the drug company Novo Nordic paid our salaries while working with this project.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
From the Department of Medicine, University Hospital
(2)
Department of Clinical Biochemistry
(3)
Neuroendocrine Labs, Guy's King's and St Thomas Schools of Medicine

References

  1. Larsson LI, Rehfeld JF: Distribution of gastrin and CCK cells in the rat gastrointestinal tract. Evidence for the occurrence of three distinct cell types storing COOH-terminal gastrin immunoreactivity. Histochemistry. 1978, 58: 23-31. 10.1007/BF00489946.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cantor P, Mortensen PE, Myhre J, Gjorup I, Worning H, Stahl E, Survill TT: The effect of the cholecystokinin receptor antagonist MK-329 on meal-stimulated pancreaticobiliary output in humans. Gastroenterology. 1992, 102: 1742-1751.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Raybold HE, Lloyd KCK: Integration of postprandial function in the proximal gastrointestinal tract. Role of CCK and sensory pathways. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1994, 713: 129-137.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mantyh CR, Pappas TN, Vigna SR: Localization of cholecystokinin A and cholecystokinin B/gastrin receptors in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology. 1994, 107: 1019-1030.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Grider JR: Role of cholecystokinin in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility. J Nutr. 1994, 124: 1334S-1339S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rehfeld JF, Hansen HF, Larsson LI, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Thorn NA: Gastrin and cholecystokinin in pituitary neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984, 81: 1902-1905.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Gores GJ, Miller LJ, LaRusso NF: Hepatic processing of cholecystokinin peptides. II. Cellular metabolism, transport, and biliary excretion. Am J Physiol. 1986, 250: G350-G356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuber JC, Bernard C, Gibard T, Chayvialle JA: Pharmacokinetics and organ catabolism of cholecystokinin octapeptide in pigs. Regul Pept. 1989, 26: 203-213. 10.1016/0167-0115(89)90188-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Land H, Grez M, Ruppert S, Schmale H, Rehbein M, Richter D, Schutz G: Deduced amino acid sequence from the bovine oxytocin-neurophysin I precursor cDNA. Nature. 1983, 302: 342-344. 10.1038/302342a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Petring OU: The effect of oxytocin on basal and pethidine-induced delayed gastric emptying. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1989, 28: 329-332.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Ohlsson B, Ringström G, Abrahamsson H, Simrén M, Björnsson ES: Oxytocin stimulates colonic motility in healthy women. Neurogastroenterol Mot. 2004, 16: 233-240. 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2004.00507.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Verbalis JG, McCann MJ, McHale CM, Stricker EM: Oxytocin secretion in response to cholecystokinin and food: Differentiation of nausea from satiety. Science. 1986, 232: 1417-1419.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Verbalis JG, Stricker EM, Robinson AG, Hoffman GE: Cholecystokinin activates c-fos expression in hypothalamic oxytocin and corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons. J Neuroendocrinology. 1991, 3: 205214-Google Scholar
  14. Ohlsson B, Forsling ML, Rehfeld JF, Sjölund K: Cholecystokinin leads to increased oxytocin secretion in healthy women. Eur J Surg. 2002, 168: 114-118. 10.1080/11024150252884340.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Buchler M, Malfertheiner P, Eiberle E, Friess H, Nustede R, Schusdziarra V, Feurle GE, Beger HG: Pancreatic trophism following colectomy in rats: the potential role of gastrointestinal hormones. Pancreas. 1988, 3: 477-483.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Salemans JMJI, Thimister PWL, Hopman WPM, Kuijpers HC, Rosenbusch G, Nagengast FM, Jansen JBMJ: Plasma cholecystokinin levels and gallbladder volumes after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surgery. 1995, 117: 705-711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nightingale JM, Kamm MA, van der Sijp JR, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Lennard-Jones JE: Gastrointestinal hormones in short bowel syndrome. Peptide YY may be the colonic brake to gastric emptying. Gut. 1996, 39: 267-272.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Monstein H-J, Grahn N, Truedsson M, Ohlsson B: Oxytocin and oxytocin receptor mRNA expression in the human gastrointestinal tract: A polymerase Chain Reaction Study. Regul Pept. 2004, 119: 39-44. 10.1016/j.regpep.2003.12.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Miaskiewicz SL, Stricker EM, Verbalis JG: Neurohypophyseal secretion in response to cholecystokinin but not meal-induced gastric distention in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989, 68: 837-843.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Balment RJ, Brimble MJ, Forsling ML, Musabayane CT: The influence of neurohypophysial hormones on renal in acutely hypophysectomized rat. J Physiol. 1986, 381: 439-452.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Rehfeld JF: Accurate measurement of cholecystokinin in plasma. Clin Chem. 1998, 44: 991-1001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bossmar T, Forsling M, Åkerlund M: Circulating oxytocin and vasopressin is influenced by ovarian steroid replacement in women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995, 74: 544-548.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirilov G, Lang RE, Kraft K, Ganten D: The effects of orchidectomy and testosterone replacement therapy on plasma and brain oxytocin in normal rats. Acta Physiologica et Pharmacologica Bulgarica. 1987, 13: 30-34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kostoglou-Athanassiou I, Treacher D, Wheeler M, Forsling ML: Melatonin administration and pituitary hormone secretion. Clin Endocrinol. 1998, 48: 31-37. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00341.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kostoglou-Athanassiou I, Treacher D, Wheeler M, Forsling ML: Neurohypophysial hormone and melatonin secretion over the natural and suppressed menstrual cycle in premenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol. 1998, 49: 209-216. 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00504.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Forsling ML, Montgomery H, Halpin D, Windle RJ, Treacher D: Daily patterns of secretion of neurohypophysial hormones in man: effect of age. Exp Physiol. 1998, 83: 409-418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuvshinoff BW, Rudnicki M, McFadden DW, Nussbaum MS, Fischer JE: Release of intraluminal and circulatory peptide YY after intravenous CCK-8S in conscious dogs. Curr Surg. 1990, 47: 338-340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McFadden DW, Rudnicki M, Kuvshinoff B, Fischer JE: Postprandial peptide YY release is mediated by cholecystokinin. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992, 175: 145-150.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu CD, Hines OJ, Newton TR, Adrian TE, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW, McFadden DW: Cholecystokinin mediation of colonic absorption via peptide YY: Foregut-Hindgut axis. World J Surg. 1996, 20: 221-227. 10.1007/s002689900034.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lluis F, Gomez G, Fujimura M, Greeley GH, Thompson JC: Peptide YY inhibits pancreatic secretion by inhibiting cholecystokinin. Gastroenterology. 1988, 94: 137-144.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu CD, Aloia T, Adrian TE, Newton TR, Bilchik AJ, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW, McFadden DW: Peptide YY: a potential proabsorptive hormone for the treatment of malabsorptive disorders. Am Surg. 1996, 62: 232-236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Nata K, Yonekura H, Yamamoto H, Okamoto H: Identification of a novel 65-kDa cell surface receptor common for pancreatic polypeptide, neuropeptide Y and peptide YY. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990, 17: 330-335. 10.1016/0006-291X(90)91397-B.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wolfe BM: Effects of gastro-entero-pancreatic hormones upon triglyceride synthesis and secretion by rat hepatocytes. Clin Invest Med. 1992, 15: 30-41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rump LC, Riess M, Schwertfeger E, Michael MC, Bohmann C, Schollmeyer P: Prejunctional neuropeptide Y receptors in human kidney and atrium. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1997, 29: 656-661. 10.1097/00005344-199705000-00014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Behar J, Biancani P: Pharmacologic characterization of excitatory and inhibitory cholecystokinin receptors of the cat gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi. Gastroenterology. 1987, 92: 764-770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Barone FC, Bondinell WE, Labosh TJ, White RF: Cholecystokinin stimulates neuronal receptors to produce contraction of the canine colon. Life Sci. 1989, 44: 533-542. 10.1016/0024-3205(89)90615-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Niederau C, Faber S, Karaus M: Cholecystokinin's role on regulation of colonic motility in health and in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 1992, 102: 1889-1898.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/4/25/prepub

Copyright

© Ohlsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement