Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Botulinum toxin in gastric submucosa reduces stimulated HCl production in rats

  • Matteo Runfola1,
  • Simone Rossi1,
  • Simona Panunzi2,
  • Pier Luigi Spada1 and
  • Daniele Gui1Email author
BMC Gastroenterology20033:26

DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-3-26

Received: 14 March 2003

Accepted: 10 September 2003

Published: 10 September 2003

Abstract

Background

Botulinum toxin blocks acetylcholine release from nerve endings and acts as a long term, reversible inhibitor of muscle contraction as well as of salivary, sweat gland, adrenal and prostatic secretions. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether gastric submucosal injection of botulinum toxin type A reduces stimulated gastric production of HCl.

Methods

Sixty-four rats were randomized in two groups and laparotomized. One group was treated with botulinum toxin-A 10 U by multiple submucosal gastric injections, while the second group was injected with saline. Two weeks later, acid secretion was stimulated by pyloric ligation and acid output was measured. Body weight, food and water intake were also recorded daily.

Results

HCl production after pyloric ligation was found to be significantly lower in botulinum toxin-treated rats (657 ± 90.25 micromol HCl vs. 1247 ± 152. P = 0.0017). Botulinum toxin-treated rats also showed significantly lower food intake and weight gain.

Conclusions

Botulinum toxin type A reduces stimulated gastric acidity. This is likely due either to inhibition of the cholinergic stimulation of gastric parietal cells, or to an action on the myenteric nervous plexuses. Reduction of growth and food intake may reflect both impaired digestion and decreased gastric motility.

Background

Botulinum toxin is produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum in seven serotypes (A through G). It is the most powerful known inhibitor of muscular contraction and acts by interfering with acetylcholine release in the neuromuscular plaque [1]. When ingested, botulinum toxin can lead to the form of food poisoning known as botulism; however, it is also a highly effective medication in patients with neural and muscular disorders. When the toxin is injected directly into the muscle, the resultant inhibition of muscle contraction is selective, prolonged and reversible. The effect begins 2–5 days after the injection, reaches its maximum in 7–10 days and lasts 1–2 months depending on the dose. Btx-A binds to a membrane receptor in the cholinergic nerve-ending and enters the fiber, where the active part of the toxin hydrolyses SNAP-25. This protein is a 206-aminoacid hydrophilic protein participating in the SNARE "fusion machine", which binds and merges vescicular and plasma membranes, eventually releasing neuromediators in the synaptic cleft. By removing a 9 aminoacid residue from SNAP-25, Btx-A determines neuromuscular paralysis. Since 1973, botulinum toxin type A (Btx-A) has been successfully used in the treatment of voluntary muscle contraction disorders, such as strabismus, dystonia, tremors. In particular, in the last decade, clinical studies have described the therapeutic use of Btx-A in some hyperkinetic diseases of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) [24]. Since 1992, the toxin has been successfully used in achalasia patients, particularly poor surgical risk subjects. In 1994 our group described the effect of Btx-A in patients with fissure-in-ano, a disease related to the hypertonus of the internal (smooth) anal sphincter [5, 6].

The action of Btx-A is not limited to the neuromuscular junction, as reported in other studies where autonomic neuroglandular transmission was found to be affected. Parotid, submandibular, nasal and sweat glands were shown to reduce consistently their secretion after local injection of the toxin, and the molecule has recently been proposed as a therapeutic option in sialorrhea, in Frey's syndrome and in the hyperhydrosis of the armpit and hand palms [712]. Btx-A was also reported to reduce the zymogen secretion from pancreas [13, 14].

The motility and the secretory activity of the gastroenteric system depend upon many neuromediators and modulators. Acid secretion is regulated by a cholinergic neuron that causes direct stimulation of the parietal cell [15]. Pyloric ligation powerfully stimulates gastric acid secretion in rats, as demonstrated in well-known experiments [16].

As botulinum toxin selectively inhibits cholinergic neural transmission, we tested the hypothesis that prior treatment with botulinum toxin would reduce the ability of rat stomachs to secrete acid after stimulation.

Methods

Surgical procedure

The experiment was approved by local Ethics Committee. Sixty-four adult Wistar male rats (weight 240–470 g) were randomized into a BTX group (32 rats) and a SALINE group (32 rats). At time 0, anaesthesia was performed with intraperitoneal injections of diazepam (2 mg Kg-1) and ketamine (2 mg Kg-1). Through a midline abdominal incision the stomach was exposed and entered along the large curve. In the BTX group, the submucosa of the gastric fundus and corpus (not the rumen) was injected with Btx-A (Botox; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, U.S.A.) 10 U in 1 mL saline, via four small injections using a 30G needle. The SALINE group was treated with saline in the same fashion. To prevent postoperative dehydration, animals were injected with 5 cc saline subcutaneously on their back. From the first post-operative day (day 1) rats were housed singly in cages and allowed to feed ad libitum (standard dry pellet diet). Body weights, weight of ingested food and milliliters of water intake were measured and recorded every day; on day 13, all rats were starved. On day 14, the rats were anaesthetized, and the pylorus was exposed and ligated through a small laparotomy. The abdominal wall was closed and 5 cc saline were injected subcutaneously. Access to water and food was denied. Four hours later a lethal dose of anaesthetic was given intraperitoneally. Esophagus and duodenum were clipped, the stomach was removed and gastric juice collected. 10 rats (7 BTX and 3 SALINE) died within the course of the two weeks.

Chemical procedure

Collected gastric juice was centrifuged (15 minutes at 4000 rpm). The supernatant was measured and titrated with NaOH to obtain the total acid output as μEq in 4 hours.

Statistics and Modeling

In order to evaluate the significance of the overall difference between the means of the two groups (BTX vs. SALINE), an analysis of variance was conducted on the HCl production of each rat.

The time-course of body weight for each rat was fitted by a piecewise linear regression model: the model assumes a linear trend of body weight decreasing from day 0 until the nadir and increasing thereafter, i.e w(t) = w 0 + k d t, 0 = t = t n ; and w(t) = w n + k g (t - t n ), t >t n ; where w [g] is the weight of the rat as a function of time, w 0 [g] is the initial weight of the rat, w n [g] is the weight of the rat at the nadir (lowest predicted weight after surgery), k d [g day -1] is the rate of weight loss in the first phase, t [day] is the time, t n [day] is the time needed to reach the nadir weight, k g [g day -1] is the rate of weight gain in the second phase. Since w n = w 0 + k d t n , the model has three free parameters: k d , k g and t n .

Linear regression analysis over time was also performed on observations of time and food and water intake on each rat, to yield estimated values of the model's parameter k food and k water (rate of food and water intake) respectively.

Results

The sample averages, standard deviations and the significance of the difference of HCl production between groups are given in Table 1. A significant difference (P < 0.002) results between the two groups, HCl total production being significantly lower in BTX rats.
Table 1

BTXvs. SALINE HCl production, body weight time-course parameters, food and water intake rates.

 

BTX group

SALINE group

P

HCl production [μEq/4 hrs]

657.031 ± 848.735

(n = 24 *)

1246.645 ± 442.128

(n = 29)

<0.002

basal body-weight [g]

343 ± 51.65

(n = 26)

350 ± 48.95

(n = 29)

N.S.

k d : rate of weight loss after treatment [g day-1]

-2.326 ± 1.607

(n = 26)

-0.3739 ± 0.8827

(n = 29)

<0.0001

k g : rate of weight gain after nadir [g day-1]

2.003 ± 1.583

(n = 26)

3.423 ± 1.593

(n = 29)

<0.0025

t n : days from time 0 to nadir of body weight [day]

2.45 ± 1.13

(n = 26)

1.374 ± 1.382

(n = 29)

<0.004

k food : rate of food intake after treatment [g day-1]

20.016 ± 4.99

(n = 26)

26.881 ± 2.896

(n = 29)

<0.0001

k water : rate of water intake after treatment [g day-1]

38.619 ± 5.325

(n = 26)

51.868 ± 11.378

(n = 29)

<0.05

* Two test tubes broke during centrifugation and datas were not available for HCl measurement.

Rate of body weight loss after surgery was faster, nadir time was later and rate of after-nadir weight gain was slower in BTX treated than in control animals (all differences highly significant). Even if rats were not significantly differing in body weight at baseline, the three effects above translate into a depressed weight recuperation of BTX rats after surgery. The average time courses of body weight for both groups are shown in Figure 1. The difference in the time course of body weight was paralleled by a significant difference in food and water consumption rates, Btx-A-treated rats eating and drinking less than control rats. Time courses of food and water intake for both groups are shown in Figures 2 and 3.
Figure 1

Time course of mean daily percentage variation of body weight in BTX and SALINE groups. Only survivors at day 14 were considered. 100% means basal body weight of each rat.

Figure 2

Time course of mean daily food intake in BTX and SALINE groups. Only survivors at day 14 were considered.

Figure 3

Time course of mean daily water intake in BTX and SALINE groups. Only survivors at day 14 were considered.

Discussion

In the present study, after pre-treatment of experimental animals with Btx-A, the technique of pyloric ligation was adopted. Basically, the mechanism involves vago-vagal reflexes induced by activated mucosal baroceptors in the antrum [17], while non-cholinergic mediators (histamin and gastrin) seem to be less involved [18].

Membrane muscarinic receptors were described on the basolateral plasma membrane of parietal cells, confirming the cholinergic innervation of HCl secretory cells [19, 20].

The significant reduction of stimulated acid output in Btx-A treated rats is consistent with the hypothesized block of neuro-glandular transmission in the parietal cells of gastric mucosa. In 1977 Kondo and Magee observed that i.v. botulinum toxin could inhibit the pentagastrin induced and in a lesser extent the histamine induced gastric acid secretion [21]. They also noted that acid response to vagal stimulation was, as expected, abolished while that to methacoline was inaltered. These observation confirm that botulinum toxin doesn't damage the secreting cells, but acts reversibly inhibiting acetylcholine release. Its action is probably so effective on gastric HCl production, because suppressing the cholinergic signal most of the pathways that conduce to acid secretion are all inhibited.

Body weight loss was observed in both groups of rats during the first days after surgery, as a likely consequence of surgical stress. After a few days, SALINE-treated rats were again growing at a normal rate. On the contrary, BTX-treated rats showed persistently lower growth rates, paralleling decreased caloric intake.

The effect is highly reproducible, both in adult and (to a lesser extent) in juvenile animals. Infact in a previous study we hypothesized that gastric peristalsis would be impaired and food intake consequently decreased. Some X-rays films of rats fed with contrast showed prolonged gastric emptying times in comparison with non-treated rats [22]. In the present study, the time course of body weight was studied with the aid of a suitable mathematical model, allowing us to quantify a first weight loss phase (which lasts a few days after injection in treated rats) and a second weight gain phase. In the present series, BTX-treated rats had steeper and more prolonged weight loss, as well as slower subsequent weight gain, compared to control animals. The observed effect on body weight might be related to impaired digestive ability, mediated by the inhibition of gastric acid secretion and possibly by other mechanisms.

Conclusions

Btx-A is a potent neuromuscular toxin: when injected in muscle, it reduces the strength of contraction in a dose-dependent manner. The effect is long lasting (1–3 months), reversible, free of major side effects.

The nervous system of the gastrointestinal tract consists of a very rich neuronal network which is organized in gangliar and agangliar plexuses, like the Meissner's and Auerbach's plexuses controlling motility, secretion, absorption and muscolaris mucosae activity.

Since gastric HCl secretion is strongly dependent upon cholinergic activity of vagal and myenteric fibers which ultimately act by their neuroglandular junctions, it was reasonable to suppose it could be inhibited by local injection of Btx-A [23, 24]. Gastric acid secretion was induced by the pyloric ligation technique a proven, powerful stimulus of acid secretion. Interestingly, this effect is reduced by vagotomy, vagolytic agents or gangliar blocking agents, i.e. by anti-cholinergic maneuvers. The observed effect on stimulated acid output after submucosal injection of Btx-A is consistent with the hypothesized impairment of neuro-glandular cholinergic transmission. It is also possible that neural stimulation was impaired at the level of myenteric plexuses, where neuro-neuronal synapses are abundant. The injection of toxin was strictly submucosal, but, since the molecule has diffusive properties, the involvement of fibers of the plexuses cannot be excluded, at least with regards to the internal plexus.

Further studies are warranted to define the site of action of Btx-A in the gastric neural network, and consequently explain the observed effects. However, the present work demonstrates that, whatever the ultimate cause of the weight loss, mucosal Btx-A injection significantly affects the mechanism of gastric acid production and determines prolonged weight loss in experimental animals.

Author's contributions

MR, SR, PLS, participated in the design and coordination of the study, performed the surgical procedure and drafted the manuscript.

SP, performed the statistical analysis.

DG, conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a Telethon-Italia grant.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Surgery, Catholic University
(2)
Biomathematics Laboratory, Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi Informatici, CNR

References

  1. Das Gupta BR: Structure and biological activity of botulinum neurotoxin. J Physiol (Paris). 1990, 84: 220-228.Google Scholar
  2. Jankovic J, Brin MF: Therapeutic uses of botulinum toxin. N Engl J Med. 1991, 324: 1186-1194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Gui D, Rossi S, Runfola M, Magalini SC: Botulinum toxin in the therapy of gastrointestinal motility disorders. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003, 18: 1-16. 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01598.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Maria G, Cassetta E, Gui D, Brisinda G, Bentivoglio AR, Albanese A: Botulinum toxin for chronic anal fissure. N Engl J Med. 1998, 338: 217-220. 10.1056/NEJM199801223380402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brisinda G, Maria G, Bentivoglio AR, Cassetta E, Gui D, Albanese A: A comparison of injection of botulinum toxin and topical nitroglycerin ointment for the tratment of chronic anal fissure. N Engl J Med. 1999, 341: 65-69. 10.1056/NEJM199907083410201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gui D, Cassetta E, Anastasio G, Bentivoglio AR, Maria G, Albanese A: Botulinum toxin for chronic anal fissure. Lancet. 1994, 344: 1127-1128. 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)90633-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shaari CM, Wu BL, Biller HF, Chuang SK, Sanders I: Botulinum toxin decreases salivation from canine submandibular glands. Otolaringol Head Neck Surg. 1998, 118: 452-457.Google Scholar
  8. Bushara KO: Sialorrhea in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a hypotesis of a new treatment – botulinum toxin A injections of the parotid glands. Med Hypoteses. 1997, 48: 337-339.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjerkhoel A, Trobbe O: Frey's syndrome: treatment with Botulinum toxin. Laryngot Otol. 1997, 111: 839-844.Google Scholar
  10. Dulguerov P, Quinodoz D, Cosendai G, Piletta P, Lehmann W: Frey syndrome treatment with botulinum toxin. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002, 122: 821-827.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Solomon BA, Hayman R: Botulinum toxin type A therapy for palmar and digital hyperhidrosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000, 42: 1026-1029. 10.1067/mjd.2000.105156.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Naver H, Swartling C, Aquilonius SM: Palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis treated with botulinum toxin: one-year clinical follow-up. Eur J Neurol. 2000, 7: 55-56. 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2000.00014.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sadoul K, Lang J, Montecucco C, Weller U, Regazzi R, Catsicas S, Wollheim CB, Halban PA: SNAP-25 is expressed in islets of Langerhans and is involved in insulin release. J Cell Biol. 1995, 128: 1019-1028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wheeler MB: Characterization of SNARE protein expression in beta cell lines and pancreatic islets. Endocrinology. 1996, 137: 1340-1348. 10.1210/en.137.4.1340.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Schubert ML, Shamburek RD: Control of acid secretion. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990, 19: 1-25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shay H, Komarov SA, Fels D., Meranze D., Gruenstein H., Siplet H: A simple method for the uniform production of gastric ulceration in the rat. Gastroenterology. 1945, 5: 43-61.Google Scholar
  17. Brodie DA: The mechanism of gastric hyperacidity produced by pylorus ligation in the rat. Am J Dig Dis. 1966, 11: 231-244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Alumets J, Ekelund M, Hakanson R, Hedenbro J, Rehfeld JF, Sundler F, Vallgren S: Gastric acid response to pylorus ligation in rats: is gastrin or histamine involved?. J Physiol. 1982, 323: 145-156.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Nakamura M, Oda M, Yonei Y, Tsukada N, Komatsu H, Kaneko K, Tsuchiya M: Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in rat gastric mucosa. A radioautographic study using a potent muscarinic antagonist, 3H-pirenzepine. Histochemistry. 1985, 83: 479-487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tokunaga T, Nishimura R, Akagi M: Muscarinic cholinergic receptors in human gastric mucosa. Jpn J Surg. 1984, 14: 122-126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kondo T, Magee DF: Modification of the action of pentagastrin on acid secretion by botulinum toxin. Experientia. 1977, 33: 750-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gui D, De Gaetano A, Spada PL, Viggiano A, Cassetta E, Albanese A: Botulinum Toxin injected in gastric wall reduces body weight and food intake in rats. Aliment pharmacol Ther. 2000, 14: 834-10.1046/j.1365-2036.2000.00765.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekblad E, Mei Q, Sundler F: Innervation of the gastric mucosa. Microsc Res Tech. 2000, 48: 241-257. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(20000301)48:5<241::AID-JEMT2>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lechago J, Barajas L: Cholinergic innervation of the simian oxyntic gastric mucosa. Am J Anat. 1976, 147: 147-152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/3/26/prepub

Copyright

© Runfola et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.